Neutel Joel, Smith David H G
Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Hypertension, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, CA, USA.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01612.x.
Angiotensin II receptor blockers are well tolerated and improve compliance in hypertensive patients. The need for 24-hour blood pressure control has focused attention on whether all agents in this class maintain smooth antihypertensive effects over a 24-hour period. Insight into this issue emerged from a meta-analysis of five large, multicenter trials in which ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was used to compare the antihypertensive effects of three angiotensin II receptor blockers: telmisartan, losartan, and valsartan. These trials used either a double-blind, placebo-controlled or a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point design. Initial analysis established the validity of combining ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data from the double-blind, placebo-controlled and prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point designs. Subsequent analyses revealed that telmisartan 80 mg was significantly more effective than losartan 50 mg and valsartan 80 mg for reducing 24-hour mean blood pressure. Furthermore, telmisartan 80 mg was comparable to amlodipine 5 mg for controlling the early morning surge in blood pressure.
血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂耐受性良好,可提高高血压患者的依从性。对24小时血压控制的需求使人们关注该类药物中的所有制剂是否能在24小时内维持平稳的降压效果。对五项大型多中心试验进行的荟萃分析为这个问题提供了见解,这些试验采用动态血压监测来比较三种血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(替米沙坦、氯沙坦和缬沙坦)的降压效果。这些试验采用了双盲、安慰剂对照或前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点设计。初步分析确定了合并双盲、安慰剂对照试验以及前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点设计试验的动态血压监测数据的有效性。后续分析显示,80毫克替米沙坦在降低24小时平均血压方面显著优于50毫克氯沙坦和80毫克缬沙坦。此外,80毫克替米沙坦在控制清晨血压骤升方面与5毫克氨氯地平相当。