Suppr超能文献

评估血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂对24小时血压的控制效果:临床数据库的荟萃分析

Evaluation of angiotensin II receptor blockers for 24-hour blood pressure control: meta-analysis of a clinical database.

作者信息

Neutel Joel, Smith David H G

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Hypertension, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01612.x.

Abstract

Angiotensin II receptor blockers are well tolerated and improve compliance in hypertensive patients. The need for 24-hour blood pressure control has focused attention on whether all agents in this class maintain smooth antihypertensive effects over a 24-hour period. Insight into this issue emerged from a meta-analysis of five large, multicenter trials in which ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was used to compare the antihypertensive effects of three angiotensin II receptor blockers: telmisartan, losartan, and valsartan. These trials used either a double-blind, placebo-controlled or a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point design. Initial analysis established the validity of combining ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data from the double-blind, placebo-controlled and prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point designs. Subsequent analyses revealed that telmisartan 80 mg was significantly more effective than losartan 50 mg and valsartan 80 mg for reducing 24-hour mean blood pressure. Furthermore, telmisartan 80 mg was comparable to amlodipine 5 mg for controlling the early morning surge in blood pressure.

摘要

血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂耐受性良好,可提高高血压患者的依从性。对24小时血压控制的需求使人们关注该类药物中的所有制剂是否能在24小时内维持平稳的降压效果。对五项大型多中心试验进行的荟萃分析为这个问题提供了见解,这些试验采用动态血压监测来比较三种血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(替米沙坦、氯沙坦和缬沙坦)的降压效果。这些试验采用了双盲、安慰剂对照或前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点设计。初步分析确定了合并双盲、安慰剂对照试验以及前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点设计试验的动态血压监测数据的有效性。后续分析显示,80毫克替米沙坦在降低24小时平均血压方面显著优于50毫克氯沙坦和80毫克缬沙坦。此外,80毫克替米沙坦在控制清晨血压骤升方面与5毫克氨氯地平相当。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of angiotensin II receptor blockers for 24-hour blood pressure control: meta-analysis of a clinical database.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Jan-Feb;5(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01612.x.
2
Comparison of telmisartan vs. valsartan in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):26-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01586.x.
4
Sustained antihypertensive activity of telmisartan compared with valsartan.
Blood Press Monit. 2004 Aug;9(4):203-10. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200408000-00005.
9
Effect of switching from telmisartan, valsartan, olmesartan, or losartan to candesartan on morning hypertension.
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2012;34(2):86-91. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2011.628729. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

4
Industry pulse : editorial development by adis international limited, Italy.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2005 Sep;12(3):195-8. doi: 10.2165/00151642-200512030-00174.
8
Guiding antihypertensive treatment decisions using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2006 Aug;8(4):330-7. doi: 10.1007/s11906-006-0073-0.
10
Metabolic effect of telmisartan and losartan in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2005 May 15;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-4-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of valsartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension.
Clin Drug Investig. 1998;16(3):203-10. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199816030-00004.
2
A chronotherapeutic approach to effective blood pressure management.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):15-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01035.x.
3
Clinical benefits of consistent reduction in the daily blood pressure of hypertensive patients.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):9-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01034.x.
4
Circadian variation in blood pressure: dipper or nondipper.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01033.x.
8
Candesartan cilexetil in combination with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide is effective in severe hypertension.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Nov 18;84(10A):35S-41S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00732-8.
10
. . . and losartan was no better than placebo.
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Oct;13(10):649-50. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000926.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验