Wasti S Arzu, Cortina Lilia M
Sabanci U.
U Michigan.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;83(2):394-405. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.394.
The authors investigated coping responses to sexual harassment across 4 samples of working women from 3 cultures and 2 occupational classes. Complete-link cluster analyses provide preliminary support for D. E. Knapp, R. H. Faley, S. E. Ekeberg, and C. L. Z. Dubois's (1997) coping framework, suggesting that avoidance, denial, negotiation, advocacy seeking, and social coping are universal responses to sexual harassment. Further, L. F. Fitzgerald's (1990) internal-external dichotomy appears to capture higher order relationships among coping responses. In addition, regression analyses suggest that Turkish and Hispanic American women engage in more avoidance than Anglo American women, and Hispanic women also use more denial but less advocacy seeking. No differences emerged in social coping. The authors discuss these results in the context of coping theory, individualism-collectivism, power distance, and patriarchal gender norms.
作者对来自3种文化和2个职业阶层的4组职业女性样本应对性骚扰的反应进行了调查。完全连锁聚类分析为D.E.克纳普、R.H.法利、S.E.埃克伯格和C.L.Z.杜波依斯(1997年)的应对框架提供了初步支持,表明回避、否认、协商、寻求支持和社交应对是应对性骚扰的普遍反应。此外,L.F.菲茨杰拉德(1990年)的内外二分法似乎抓住了应对反应之间的高阶关系。此外,回归分析表明,土耳其裔和西班牙裔美国女性比英裔美国女性更多地采用回避策略,西班牙裔女性也更多地使用否认策略,但寻求支持的策略较少。社交应对方面没有差异。作者在应对理论、个人主义-集体主义、权力距离和父权制性别规范的背景下讨论了这些结果。