Clump Michael, Ramanaiah Nerella V, Sharpe J Patrick
Department of Psychology, Boise State University, ID 83725-1715, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2002 Jun;90(3 Pt 2):1174-8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3c.1174.
The hypothesis that High ECOSCALE and Low ECOSCALE groups would have different value profiles was tested using 319 introductory psychology students (187 women and 132 men). The participants completed the ECOSCALE and Schwartz's Value Survey for partial course credit, after which the means of the two groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses of variance on Schwartz's Value Survey. Analysis indicated that the groups scoring high and low on the ECOSCALE had significantly different Value profiles, which supported the hypothesis. In addition, the High ECOSCALE group scored significantly lower on the Power scale and significantly higher on the Universalism and Benevolence scales.
我们使用319名心理学导论课程的学生(187名女性和132名男性)来检验高生态量表组和低生态量表组是否具有不同的价值观概况这一假设。参与者完成生态量表和施瓦茨价值观调查问卷以获取部分课程学分,之后使用施瓦茨价值观调查问卷的单变量和多变量方差分析对两组的均值进行比较。分析表明,在生态量表上得分高和低的组具有显著不同的价值观概况,这支持了该假设。此外,高生态量表组在权力量表上得分显著较低,而在普遍主义和仁爱量表上得分显著较高。