Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Int J Psychol. 2014 Aug;49(4):240-8. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12004. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
This study examines the relationship between Inglehart's and Schwartz's value dimensions-both at the individual and the country levels. By rotating one set of items towards the other, we show that these value dimensions have more in common than previously reported. The ranking of countries (N = 47) based on Schwartz's Embeddedness--Autonomy and the Survival--Self-Expression dimensions reached a maximum of similarity, r = .82, after rotating Inglehart's factor scores 27 degrees clockwise. The correlation between the other pair of dimensions (Schwartz's Hierarchy-Mastery--Egalitarianism-Harmony and Inglehart's Traditional--Secular-Rational values) was near zero before and after rotation. At the individual level (N = 46,444), positive correlations were found for Schwartz's Conservation--Openness dimension with both of Inglehart's dimensions (Survival--Self-Expression and Traditional--Secular-Rational values). The highest correlation with this Schwartz dimension was obtained at the Secular-Rational/Self-Expression diagonal, r = .24, after rotating the factor scores 45 degrees clockwise. We conclude that Schwartz's and Inglehart's originally proposed two-dimensional value structures share one dimension at the country level and some commonality at the individual level, whereas the respective other pair of dimensions seem to be more or less unrelated.
本研究考察了英格尔哈特(Inglehart)和施瓦茨(Schwartz)价值观维度之间的关系——无论是在个人层面还是国家层面。通过将一组项目旋转到另一组项目上,我们发现这些价值观维度比之前报道的有更多的共同点。基于施瓦茨的“嵌入性-自主性”和“生存-自我表达”维度对国家(N=47)进行排名,在将英格尔哈特的因子得分顺时针旋转 27 度后,达到了最大相似性,r=0.82。在旋转之前和之后,另一对维度(施瓦茨的“等级制-控制”与“平等主义-和谐”和英格尔哈特的“传统-世俗理性”价值观)之间的相关性接近零。在个人层面(N=46444),施瓦茨的“保守-开放”维度与英格尔哈特的两个维度(“生存-自我表达”和“传统-世俗理性”价值观)都呈正相关。在将因子得分顺时针旋转 45 度后,与这个施瓦茨维度的相关性最高,r=0.24,位于世俗理性/自我表达对角线上。我们得出结论,施瓦茨和英格尔哈特最初提出的二维价值观结构在国家层面上共享一个维度,在个人层面上也有一些共同性,而各自的另一对维度似乎或多或少没有关联。