Smith Timothy L, Han Joseph K, Loehrl Todd A, Rhee John S
Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2002 May;112(5):784-90. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200205000-00004.
To evaluate alternative management strategies for anterior table frontal sinus fractures involving the frontal sinus outflow tract.
A prospective cohort of patients with anterior table frontal sinus fracture with frontal outflow tract involvement documented by computed tomography (CT) scan was examined between 1999 and 2001.
A select group of patients with anterior table frontal sinus fracture involving the frontal outflow tract was treated with open reduction of bony fracture without osteoplastic obliteration of the frontal sinus. Serial CT scans were obtained starting at 8 weeks after injury. Patients with persistent frontal sinus obstruction after medical treatment underwent an extended endoscopic frontal sinusotomy or a modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure.
Fourteen patients sustained frontal sinus fractures and were treated during the study period. Seven patients were included in the modified treatment algorithm, with a mean follow-up of 18 months. All patients had concurrent facial fractures: superior orbital rim (n = 5), naso-orbital-ethmoid complex (n = 2), mandible (n = 2), and midface (n = 2). All 7 patients underwent open repair of the facial fractures. Postoperatively, 5 patients had spontaneous frontal sinus ventilation. Two patients, both of whom had naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures, had persistent frontal sinus obstruction clinically and radiographically. These patients were successfully managed with an endoscopic frontal sinus procedure.
A select group of patients with frontal sinus and outflow tract fracture may be managed with open repair of the anterior table fracture without obliteration. In these cases, suspected frontal outflow tract obstruction can be managed expectantly. Failed frontal sinus ventilation may require endoscopic frontal sinus surgery to reestablish mucociliary clearance.
评估涉及额窦流出道的额窦前壁骨折的替代治疗策略。
对1999年至2001年间通过计算机断层扫描(CT)记录有额窦流出道受累的额窦前壁骨折患者进行前瞻性队列研究。
选择一组涉及额窦流出道的额窦前壁骨折患者,采用骨折切开复位术治疗,不进行额窦骨成形术闭塞。受伤后8周开始进行系列CT扫描。药物治疗后仍存在额窦阻塞的患者接受扩大的内镜额窦切开术或改良的内镜Lothrop手术。
14例患者在研究期间发生额窦骨折并接受治疗。7例患者纳入改良治疗方案,平均随访18个月。所有患者均合并面部骨折:眶上缘骨折(5例)、鼻眶筛复合体骨折(2例)、下颌骨骨折(2例)和中面部骨折(2例)。所有7例患者均接受了面部骨折的开放修复。术后,5例患者额窦自发通气。2例均为鼻眶筛骨折的患者,临床和影像学检查均显示额窦持续阻塞。这些患者通过内镜额窦手术成功治疗。
一组额窦和流出道骨折患者可采用额窦前壁骨折开放修复术而不进行闭塞处理。在这些病例中,疑似额窦流出道阻塞可进行观察处理。额窦通气失败可能需要内镜额窦手术来重建黏液纤毛清除功能。