Frost G, Lyons F, Bovill-Taylor C, Carter L, Stuttard J, Dornhorst A
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, UK.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2002 Aug;15(4):287-95; quiz 297-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2002.00373.x.
Obesity is on the increase yet within the National Health Service (NHS) treatment approaches differ greatly and service is patchy. Our aim was to compare current practice within a general dietetic clinic with a new clinic developed specifically for patients of higher morbidity risk.
Locally referred patients to the dietitians from within or without Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust of higher morbidity risk were invited to attend a new Lifestyle Clinic. Treatment was of a contractual nature and included more time with the dietitian, the offer of pharmacotherapy if appropriate and an emphasis on achieving a realistic weight loss of 10% within a 6-month period. Cognitive behavioural strategies were utilized focusing on achieving changes in dietary intake and physical activity levels.
A total of 103 patients have been enrolled of whom 34 have been discharged before completion of the clinic programme. Twenty-six patients have completed (18 started pharmocotherapy with Orlistat and eight remained on lifestyle advice only), with the remainder still attending the Lifestyle Clinic. The results for these 26 patients demonstrate clinically significant benefits with regard to exercise tolerance 390.8 +/- 37.5 m vs. 473 +/- 46.6 m (P < 0.001), waist measurement 121.5 +/- 4.4 cm vs. 110.9 +/- 3.6 cm (P < 0.001), and total cholesterol : HDL ratio 1.17 +/- 0.05 mmol L-1 vs. 1.27 +/- 0.07 mmol L-1 (P < 0.05). A weight loss comparison with historical data collected in the general dietetic clinic achieves a 7.8 +/- 0.7 kg reduction in weight (with pharmocotherapy 8.96 +/- 0.98 kg, with lifestyle only 5.23 +/- 0.657) vs. 1.7 +/- 0.4 kg (P < 0.05).
Lifestyle clinics facilitate beneficial lifestyle changes which impact positively on morbidity risk factors demonstrating an improvement on current service offered within the NHS. There is an obvious resource implication of offering an intensive management package. There is need for a randomized control trial with analysis to evaluate whether there is cost benefit from this type of intervention.
肥胖现象日益增多,但在国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中,治疗方法差异很大,服务也参差不齐。我们的目的是比较普通饮食诊所与专门为高发病风险患者设立的新诊所的当前治疗情况。
邀请从哈默史密斯医院NHS信托机构内外转诊至营养师处的高发病风险患者参加新的生活方式诊所。治疗具有契约性质,包括与营养师相处更多时间、酌情提供药物治疗,并强调在6个月内实现实际体重减轻10%。采用认知行为策略,重点是改变饮食摄入量和身体活动水平。
共招募了103名患者,其中34名在诊所项目完成前出院。26名患者已完成治疗(18名开始使用奥利司他进行药物治疗,8名仅接受生活方式建议),其余患者仍在生活方式诊所就诊。这26名患者的结果显示,在运动耐量方面有临床显著益处(390.8±37.5米对473±46.6米,P<0.001)、腰围方面(121.5±4.4厘米对110.9±3.6厘米,P<0.001)以及总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白比值方面(1.17±0.05毫摩尔/升对1.27±0.07毫摩尔/升,P<0.05)。与普通饮食诊所收集的历史数据进行的体重减轻比较显示,体重减轻了7.8±0.7千克(药物治疗组为8.96±0.98千克,仅生活方式干预组为5.23±0.657千克),而历史数据组为1.7±0.4千克(P<0.05)。
生活方式诊所有助于实现有益的生活方式改变,对发病风险因素产生积极影响,表明比NHS目前提供的服务有所改善。提供强化管理方案显然会涉及资源问题。需要进行一项随机对照试验并进行分析,以评估这种干预措施是否具有成本效益。