Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗年轻患者的危及生命的心律失常。

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy for life-threatening arrhythmias in young patients.

作者信息

Stefanelli Christopher B, Bradley David J, Leroy Sarah, Dick Macdonald, Serwer Gerald A, Fischbach Peter S

机构信息

University of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, Women's Hospital, UMHS, L1242, Box 0204, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0204, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;6(3):235-44. doi: 10.1023/a:1019509803992.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the indications, efficacy and outcomes of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) use in the pediatric population.

BACKGROUND

ICDs are first-line therapy for adults resuscitated from sudden cardiac death (SCD) or at high risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Use of ICDs in children and young adults is infrequent and there are few data regarding this group.

METHODS

We abstracted and analyzed data for all patients in whom ICDs were implanted.

RESULTS

A total of 38 devices were implanted in 27 patients. Age ranged from 6 to 26 years (mean, 14) and weight ranged from 16 to 124 kg (mean, 47). Diagnoses included long QT syndrome (9), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [6], repaired congenital heart disease [5];, and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation [4]. Indications comprised resuscitated SCD [15], syncope [9], and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia [3]. Initial device placement was infraclavicular in 13, abdominal in 13 and intrathoracic in 1. Epicardial leads were used with 5 systems. A single coil lead was used in 17. Seven patients, all previously resuscitated from SCD, experienced 88 appropriate successful discharges. There were 6 inappropriate discharges in 3 patients. Mean time to device replacement was 3.1 years (n = 11). Complications included 2 infected systems, 2 lead dislodgments, 2 lead fractures, 1 post-pericardiotomy syndrome, 1 adverse event with defibrillation threshold (DFT); testing, and 1 patient with psychiatric sequelae. No deaths occurred with implanted ICDs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that ICDs provide safe and effective therapy in young patients. The indications for ICDs as primary preventive therapy remain uncertain.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在儿科患者中的应用指征、疗效及预后。

背景

ICD是成人心脏性猝死(SCD)复苏后或有危及生命的室性心律失常高风险患者的一线治疗方法。ICD在儿童和青年中的应用较少,关于该群体的数据也很少。

方法

我们提取并分析了所有植入ICD患者的数据。

结果

共27例患者植入了38台设备。年龄范围为6至26岁(平均14岁),体重范围为16至124千克(平均47千克)。诊断包括长QT综合征(9例)、肥厚型心肌病(6例)、先天性心脏病修复术后(5例)以及特发性室性心动过速/心室颤动(4例)。植入指征包括SCD复苏后(15例)、晕厥(9例)以及危及生命的室性心律失常(3例)。初始设备植入位置为锁骨下13例、腹部13例、胸腔内1例。5套系统使用了心外膜导线。17例使用了单线圈导线。7例患者(均曾从SCD中复苏)经历了88次恰当的成功放电。3例患者发生了6次不恰当放电。设备更换的平均时间为3.1年(n = 11)。并发症包括2例系统感染、2例导线脱位、2例导线断裂、1例心包切开术后综合征、1例除颤阈值(DFT)测试不良事件以及1例有精神后遗症的患者。植入ICD期间无死亡发生。

结论

这些数据表明,ICD在年轻患者中提供了安全有效的治疗。ICD作为一级预防治疗的指征仍不明确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验