Soares Luiz Carlos Rangel, Griesinger Marilena O, Dachs J Norberto W, Bittner Marta A, Tavares Sonia
Division of Health and Environment (HEP), Program of Basic Sanitation (HES), Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., USA.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2002 May-Jun;11(5-6):386-96. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892002000500013.
To identify and evaluate inequities in access to drinking water services as reflected in household per capita expenditure on water, and to determine what proportion of household expenditures is spent on water in 11 countries of Latin America and the Caribbean.
Using data from multi-purpose household surveys (such as the Living Standards Measurement Survey Study) conducted in 11 countries from 1995 to 1999, the availability of drinking water as well as total and per capita household expenditures on drinking water were analyzed in light of socioeconomic parameters, such as urban vs. rural setting, household income, type and regularity of water supply service, time spent obtaining water in homes not served by running water, and type of water-purifying treatment, if any.
Access to drinking water as well as total and per capita household expenditures on drinking water show an association with household income, economic conditions of the household, and location. The access of the rural population to drinking water services is much more restricted than that of the urban population for groups having similar income. The proportion of families having a household water supply system is comparable in the higher-income rural population and the lower-income urban population. Families without a household water supply system spend a considerable amount of time getting water. For poorer families, this implies additional costs. Low-income families that lack a household water supply spend as much money on water as do families with better income. Access to household water disinfection methods is very limited among poor families due to its relatively high cost, which results in poorer drinking water quality in the lower-income population.
Multi-purpose household surveys conducted from the consumer's point of view are important tools for research on equity and health, especially when studying unequal access to, use of, and expenditures on drinking water. It is recommended that countries improve their portion of the surveys that deals with water and sanitation in order to facilitate national health assessments and the establishment of more equitable subsidy programs.
识别并评估以家庭人均水费支出所反映的饮用水服务获取方面的不平等现象,并确定拉丁美洲和加勒比地区11个国家家庭支出中用于水的比例。
利用1995年至1999年在11个国家进行的多用途家庭调查(如生活水平测量调查研究)的数据,根据社会经济参数,如城乡环境、家庭收入、供水服务类型和规律性、在没有自来水供应的家庭中取水所花费的时间以及水净化处理类型(如有),分析饮用水的可获得性以及家庭在饮用水方面的总支出和人均支出。
饮用水的可获得性以及家庭在饮用水方面的总支出和人均支出与家庭收入、家庭经济状况和地理位置相关。对于收入相似的群体,农村人口获得饮用水服务的机会比城市人口受到的限制要大得多。在高收入农村人口和低收入城市人口中,拥有家庭供水系统的家庭比例相当。没有家庭供水系统的家庭取水要花费大量时间。对于较贫困家庭来说,这意味着额外成本。缺乏家庭供水系统的低收入家庭在水上的花费与收入较好的家庭一样多。由于成本相对较高,贫困家庭获得家庭水消毒方法的机会非常有限,这导致低收入人群的饮用水质量较差。
从消费者角度进行的多用途家庭调查是研究公平性和健康问题的重要工具,尤其是在研究饮用水获取、使用和支出方面的不平等时。建议各国增加调查中与水和卫生相关的部分,以便于进行国家健康评估并建立更公平的补贴计划。