Amella E J
Medical University of South Carolina, College of Nursing, Charleston 29425, USA.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2002;6(2):117-22.
For persons unable to feed themselves, resistance to assistance with meals may result in increased morbidity and premature mortality because of inadequate nutritional intake. Additionally, unwillingness to accept food offered has social and ethical implications in all cultures and may influence caregiving.
As part of a larger study, this analysis sought to determine if resistance or willingness to accept assistance at meals by persons with dementia could be predicted by various personal interaction and contextual factors.
Resistance was studied in a sample of 53 nursing home residents with late-stage dementia who were assisted at meals by CNAs. Using the EdFED-Q (Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia Questionnaire), two groups of individuals who were being fed were identified: those who resisted assistance (n = 23) and those who accepted assistance (n = 30). Proportion of food consumed was determined by percentage of weight decrease in food offered.
Differences between the two groups were identified. Although not differing in degree of cognitive impairment as measured by the MMSE or Body Mass Index, significant differences (p < .05) were found in level of functioning as measured by the Global Deterioration Scale, the proportion of food consumed and amount of time taken to assist with the meal. Resistors showed significantly different interaction behaviors in 8 of the 10 on the Interaction Behavior Measure-Modified when correlated with food consumed (r = .49 - .68, p < .02).
When examining resistance to feeding a variety of factors must be examined, including the quality of the interaction between the caregiver and the person being fed.
对于无法自行进食的人来说,抗拒进餐协助可能会因营养摄入不足而导致发病率上升和过早死亡。此外,不愿接受提供的食物在所有文化中都具有社会和伦理意义,并且可能会影响护理工作。
作为一项更大规模研究的一部分,本分析旨在确定痴呆症患者在进餐时抗拒或愿意接受协助的情况是否可以通过各种人际互动和情境因素来预测。
在53名患有晚期痴呆症的养老院居民样本中研究了抗拒情况,这些居民由护理助理协助进餐。使用EdFED-Q(爱丁堡痴呆症进食评估问卷),确定了两组正在接受喂食的个体:抗拒协助的个体(n = 23)和接受协助的个体(n = 30)。通过提供食物重量减少的百分比来确定食物消耗比例。
确定了两组之间的差异。尽管在通过简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)或体重指数衡量的认知障碍程度上没有差异,但在通过整体衰退量表衡量的功能水平、食物消耗比例和协助进餐所需时间方面发现了显著差异(p < .05)。在与食物消耗相关时,抗拒者在互动行为测量-修订版的10项中的8项上表现出显著不同的互动行为(r = .49 - .68,p < .02)。
在研究喂食抗拒情况时,必须考虑多种因素,包括护理人员与被喂食者之间互动的质量。