Fazio Russell H, Olson Michael A
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1222, USA.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:297-327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
Behavioral scientists have long sought measures of important psychological constructs that avoid response biases and other problems associated with direct reports. Recently, a large number of such indirect, or "implicit," measures have emerged. We review research that has utilized these measures across several domains, including attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, and discuss their predictive validity, their interrelations, and the mechanisms presumably underlying their operation. Special attention is devoted to various priming measures and the Implicit Association Test, largely due to their prevalence in the literature. We also attempt to clarify several unresolved theoretical and empirical issues concerning implicit measures, including the nature of the underlying constructs they purport to measure, the conditions under which they are most likely to relate to explicit measures, the kinds of behavior each measure is likely to predict, their sensitivity to context, and the construct's potential for change.
行为科学家长期以来一直在寻找重要心理结构的测量方法,以避免反应偏差和其他与直接报告相关的问题。最近,大量此类间接或“隐性”测量方法出现了。我们回顾了在多个领域(包括态度、自尊和刻板印象)使用这些测量方法的研究,并讨论了它们的预测效度、相互关系以及可能构成其运作基础的机制。由于它们在文献中的广泛存在,我们特别关注各种启动测量方法和内隐联想测验。我们还试图澄清有关隐性测量的几个未解决的理论和实证问题,包括它们声称要测量的潜在结构的性质、它们最有可能与显性测量相关的条件、每种测量方法可能预测的行为类型、它们对情境的敏感性以及该结构的变化潜力。