• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我意识与刻板印象:准确预测内隐性别刻板印象

Self-Awareness and Stereotypes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Gender Stereotyping.

机构信息

University Hospital Tübingen, Germany.

University of Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Dec;49(12):1695-1708. doi: 10.1177/01461672221120703. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1177/01461672221120703
PMID:36062337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10637100/
Abstract

Research showing that people can predict the patterns of their implicit evaluations toward social groups has raised questions concerning how widely these findings extend to other domains, such as semantic implicit stereotyping. In a preregistered laboratory study, participants were asked to predict their scores on five implicit gender stereotyping Implicit Associations Tests (IATs). Within-subjects correlations between IAT score predictions and IAT scores showed high levels of accuracy. Although part of the IAT score patterns could be predicted from shared knowledge, own predictions significantly outperformed predictions of random others and normative patterns, suggesting self-awareness beyond reliance on shared knowledge. In line with dual-process models emphasizing that different information is captured by implicit as opposed to explicit measures, predictions explained correlations between implicit and traditional explicit stereotyping measures, and led to acknowledgment of bias. Discussion focuses on understanding conscious awareness of semantic automatic processes and conceptualizations of the cognitions underlying implicit measures.

摘要

研究表明,人们可以预测自己对社会群体的隐性评价模式,这引发了人们的疑问,即这些发现会在多大程度上扩展到其他领域,例如语义内隐刻板印象。在一项预先注册的实验室研究中,参与者被要求预测他们在五个性别刻板印象内隐联想测验(IAT)上的得分。IAT 得分预测与 IAT 得分之间的受试者内相关显示出高度的准确性。虽然部分 IAT 得分模式可以从共同知识中预测,但自己的预测明显优于随机他人和规范模式的预测,这表明自我意识不仅仅依赖于共同知识。与强调不同信息由内隐而非外显测量捕获的双加工模型一致,预测解释了内隐和传统外显刻板印象测量之间的相关性,并导致对偏见的认识。讨论的重点是理解语义自动过程的有意识意识和对内隐测量所依据的认知的概念化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d77/10637100/ffdfc5c1e867/10.1177_01461672221120703-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d77/10637100/ffdfc5c1e867/10.1177_01461672221120703-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d77/10637100/ffdfc5c1e867/10.1177_01461672221120703-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-Awareness and Stereotypes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Gender Stereotyping.自我意识与刻板印象:准确预测内隐性别刻板印象
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Dec;49(12):1695-1708. doi: 10.1177/01461672221120703. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
2
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
3
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Implicit bias towards people with disability in Australia: relationship with personal values.澳大利亚对残疾人的隐性偏见:与个人价值观的关系。
Aust J Psychol. 2025 May 26;77(1):2507626. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2507626. eCollection 2025.
5
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
6
Autistic People's Experience of Empathy and the Autistic Empathy Deficit Narrative.自闭症患者的共情体验与自闭症共情缺陷叙事
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):321-330. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0001. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.医疗保健专业人员中的隐性偏见:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
In the Mind's Eye: Exploring the Relationship Between Visual Mental Imagery and Stereotyping.在心灵之眼中:探索视觉心理意象与刻板印象之间的关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Sep 16:10888683241273350. doi: 10.1177/10888683241273350.
10
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management克服肥胖管理中的耻辱感和偏见

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the Self-Awareness of Ego-Threatening Biases Questionnaire (SAETBQ).自我威胁性偏差问卷(SAETBQ)的编制与验证
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0327989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327989. eCollection 2025.
2
Self-other differences in the perceived authenticity of attitudes expressed toward social groups.对社会群体所表达态度的感知真实性中的自我与他人差异。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;15:1467396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1467396. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Anomalies in implicit attitudes research.内隐态度研究中的异常现象。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;13(1):e1569. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1569. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
2
Can the Implicit Association Test Serve as a Valid Measure of Automatic Cognition? A Response to Schimmack (2021).内隐联想测验能否作为自动认知的有效测量手段?——回应施马克(2021)。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):422-434. doi: 10.1177/1745691620904080. Epub 2020 May 6.
3
The Bidirectional Causal Relation Between Implicit Stereotypes and Implicit Prejudice.
内隐刻板印象和内隐偏见之间的双向因果关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Sep;46(9):1318-1330. doi: 10.1177/0146167219899234. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
The relationship between implicit intergroup attitudes and beliefs.内隐群体态度与信念之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):5862-5871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820240116. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
Facing one's implicit biases: From awareness to acknowledgment.正视隐性偏见:从意识觉醒到承认。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 May;116(5):769-794. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000155. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Backlash against gender stereotype-violating preschool children.反对违反性别刻板印象的学前儿童的反弹。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0195503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195503. eCollection 2018.
7
Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children's interests.性别刻板印象在智力方面很早就出现了,并影响着孩子们的兴趣。
Science. 2017 Jan 27;355(6323):389-391. doi: 10.1126/science.aah6524.
8
Awareness of implicit attitudes.内隐态度的意识
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1369-92. doi: 10.1037/a0035028. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
9
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength.态度作为强度各异的对象-评价关联。
Soc Cogn. 2007 Oct 1;25(5):603-637. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603.