Dandachi Nadia, Dietze Otto, Hauser-Kronberger Cornelia
Institute of Pathology, Landeskliniken Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Lab Invest. 2002 Aug;82(8):1007-14. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000024360.48464.a4.
The high incidence of HER2 overexpression on the cell surface of breast cancer cells and the recognized prognostic and potentially predictive value of HER2 render this cell surface receptor a novel and important therapeutic target. Although immunohistochemistry (IHC; HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; PathVysion and INFORM)-both approved by the Food and Drug Administration-have emerged as the most viable assays for evaluation of HER2 status in routine clinical practice, there is still no consensus on which is the best method for assessing HER2 status. Therefore, our specific objective was to establish a chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assay for the detection of HER2 amplification on a cohort of 173 archival invasive breast carcinomas. Results were compared with HercepTest, which is the most frequently used method for detecting HER2 alteration. Additionally, HER2 gene copy number was investigated using differential PCR (dPCR) as a testing system. HER2 overexpression was found by IHC in 24.3%; HER2 amplification was found by CISH in 19.1% and by dPCR in 9.2% of the tumors. The overall concordance rate was 95.9% between CISH and IHC and 85.0% between dPCR and IHC. Kappa statistics revealed an excellent agreement between IHC and CISH (kappa = 0.878), but only a moderate agreement was found between IHC and dPCR (kappa = 0.482). Discrepant cases between CISH and HercepTest and all IHC-positive cases (+2 and +3), a total of 42 cases, were analyzed with the FISH PathVysion (Vysis) assay. Among 25 HercepTest-positive cases (score +3), 2 showed no gene amplification by FISH or CISH. Four of 13 tumors with weak HER2 overexpression (score +2) were negative with both FISH and CISH. Concordance between CISH and FISH was 100% for the 38 cases analyzed. The current study showed that CISH represents a practical and simple assay for evaluating HER2 gene amplification in archival material, offering a promising alternative to IHC or FISH for the routine diagnostic setting.
人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)在乳腺癌细胞表面的高表达率,以及其公认的预后价值和潜在预测价值,使这种细胞表面受体成为一个新的重要治疗靶点。尽管免疫组织化学(IHC;赫赛汀检测)和荧光原位杂交(FISH;PathVysion和INFORM)——均已获美国食品药品监督管理局批准——已成为常规临床实践中评估HER2状态最可行的检测方法,但对于哪种是评估HER2状态的最佳方法仍未达成共识。因此,我们的具体目标是建立一种显色原位杂交(CISH)检测方法,用于检测173例存档浸润性乳腺癌中的HER2扩增情况。将结果与赫赛汀检测(检测HER2改变最常用的方法)进行比较。此外,使用差异聚合酶链反应(dPCR)作为检测系统研究HER2基因拷贝数。免疫组织化学检测发现HER2过表达率为24.3%;显色原位杂交检测发现HER2扩增率为19.1%,差异聚合酶链反应检测发现HER2扩增率为9.2%。显色原位杂交与免疫组织化学的总体一致性率为95.9%,差异聚合酶链反应与免疫组织化学的总体一致性率为85.0%。Kappa统计显示免疫组织化学与显色原位杂交之间一致性极佳(kappa = 0.878),但免疫组织化学与差异聚合酶链反应之间仅发现中度一致性(kappa = 0.482)。对显色原位杂交与赫赛汀检测结果不一致的病例以及所有免疫组织化学阳性病例(+2和+3),共42例,采用FISH PathVysion(Vysis)检测进行分析。在25例赫赛汀检测阳性病例(评分+3)中,2例荧光原位杂交或显色原位杂交显示无基因扩增。13例HER2弱过表达(评分+2)肿瘤中,4例荧光原位杂交和显色原位杂交均为阴性。分析的38例病例中,显色原位杂交与荧光原位杂交的一致性为100%。当前研究表明,显色原位杂交是评估存档材料中HER2基因扩增的一种实用且简便的检测方法,为常规诊断提供了一种有望替代免疫组织化学或荧光原位杂交的方法。