Brewin C R, Beaton A
Subdepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
Behav Res Ther. 2002 Aug;40(8):923-30. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00127-9.
The importance of individual differences in intelligence and working memory capacity in predicting the ability to intentionally suppress thoughts was investigated. Sixty participants completed a thought suppression task, and measures of working memory capacity (OSPAN), fluid intelligence (Raven's Matrices), and crystallised intelligence (the National Adult Reading Test). As predicted, the results indicated that more effective thought suppression was independently related to higher working memory capacity and greater fluid intelligence, but was unrelated to crystallised intelligence. The findings have theoretical implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying a failure to inhibit unwanted intrusions and clinical implications for disorders involving high levels of intrusive thoughts and memories.
研究了智力和工作记忆容量方面的个体差异在预测有意抑制思维能力中的重要性。60名参与者完成了一项思维抑制任务,并进行了工作记忆容量(操作广度任务)、流体智力(瑞文推理测验)和晶体智力(国家成人阅读测验)的测量。正如预期的那样,结果表明,更有效的思维抑制与更高的工作记忆容量和更强的流体智力独立相关,但与晶体智力无关。这些发现对于理解抑制不必要侵入失败背后的机制具有理论意义,对于涉及高水平侵入性思维和记忆的疾病具有临床意义。