Bromet Evelyn J, Gluzman Semyon, Schwartz Joseph E, Goldgaber Dmitry
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8790, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Aug;110 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):625-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s4625.
Exposure to the Chornobyl nuclear power plant explosion resulted in widespread, persistent somatic complaints, but little is known about the nature and risk factors for these conditions. This study compares the health reports of 300 women evacuated to Kyiv from the contamination zone around the plant and 300 controls with a child in the same homeroom as the evacuees in 1997. The interview addressed somatic concerns, risk factors for poor health, and Chornobyl-related stress. Compared with controls, evacuees reported significantly more health problems and rated their health more poorly overall. These differences remained significant after controlling for demographic and clinical risk factors, including the tendency to amplify physical symptoms. Significantly more evacuees received a diagnosis of a Chornobyl-related illness by a local physician, believed that their health and their children's health had been adversely affected, and were positive for Chornobyl-induced post-traumatic stress disorder. After controlling for these Chornobyl stress variables, the differences in number of health problems commonly attributed to Chornobyl remained significant but differences in general health ratings did not. The perceptions of controls were similar to those of women in a national sample. The relationship between Chornobyl stress and illness was twice as strong in evacuees (odds ratio = 6.95) as in Kyiv controls (odds ratio = 3.34) and weakest in the national sample (odds ratio = 1.64). The results confirm the persistence and nonspecificity of the subjective medical consequences of Chornobyl and are consistent with the hypothesis that traumatic events exert their greatest negative impacts on health in vulnerable or disadvantaged groups.
接触切尔诺贝利核电站爆炸事故导致了广泛而持续的躯体不适,但对于这些状况的性质和风险因素却知之甚少。本研究比较了300名从核电站周边污染区疏散至基辅的女性与300名对照者(1997年与疏散者在同一教室的孩子的家长)的健康报告。访谈涉及躯体问题、健康不佳的风险因素以及与切尔诺贝利相关的压力。与对照者相比,疏散者报告的健康问题显著更多,总体健康评分也更低。在控制了人口统计学和临床风险因素,包括放大身体症状的倾向后,这些差异仍然显著。有更多疏散者被当地医生诊断为患有与切尔诺贝利相关的疾病,认为自己的健康和孩子的健康受到了不利影响,并且切尔诺贝利诱发的创伤后应激障碍呈阳性。在控制了这些与切尔诺贝利相关的压力变量后,通常归因于切尔诺贝利的健康问题数量差异仍然显著,但总体健康评分差异不再显著。对照者的看法与全国样本中的女性相似。切尔诺贝利压力与疾病之间的关系在疏散者中(优势比 = 6.95)是基辅对照者中(优势比 = 3.34)的两倍,在全国样本中最弱(优势比 = 1.64)。结果证实了切尔诺贝利主观医学后果的持续性和非特异性,并且与创伤性事件对弱势群体健康产生最大负面影响的假设一致。