Sekine Akihiro, Nakahara Kazunari, Sato Junya, Michikawa Yosuke, Suetani Keigo, Morita Ryo, Igarashi Yosuke, Itoh Fumio
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 16;10(16):3606. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163606.
Acute cholangitis (AC) is often associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage (EBD) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a treatment of choice. However, no evidence exists on the outcomes of EBD for AC associated with DIC. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the treatment outcomes of early EBD and compared endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD). We included 62 patients who received early EBD (EBS: 30, ENBD: 32) for AC, associated with DIC. The rates of clinical success for AC and DIC resolution at 7 days after EBD were 90.3% and 88.7%, respectively. Mean hospitalization period was 31.7 days, and in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8%. ERCP-related adverse events developed in 3.2% of patients (bleeding in two patients). Comparison between EBS and ENBD groups showed that the ENBD group included patients with more severe cholangitis, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, and serum bilirubin level were significantly higher in this group. However, no significant difference was observed in clinical outcomes between the two groups; both EBS and ENBD were effective. In conclusion, early EBD is effective and safe for patients with AC associated with DIC.
急性胆管炎(AC)常与弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)相关,在内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)下进行内镜乳头胆管引流(EBD)是一种首选治疗方法。然而,对于与DIC相关的AC患者,EBD治疗效果尚无证据。因此,我们回顾性评估了早期EBD的治疗效果,并比较了内镜胆管支架置入术(EBS)和内镜鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)。我们纳入了62例因AC合并DIC接受早期EBD治疗的患者(EBS组30例,ENBD组32例)。EBD术后7天AC临床成功率和DIC缓解率分别为90.3%和88.7%。平均住院时间为31.7天,住院死亡率为4.8%。3.2%的患者发生了与ERCP相关的不良事件(2例出血)。EBS组和ENBD组比较显示,ENBD组胆管炎更严重,该组急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II、全身炎症反应综合征评分及血清胆红素水平显著更高。然而,两组临床结局无显著差异;EBS和ENBD均有效。总之,早期EBD对AC合并DIC患者有效且安全。