Eadie P A, Fey M E, Douglas J M, Parsons C L
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Aug;45(4):720-32. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/058).
The purpose of the present study was to examine the grammatical morphology and sentence imitation performance of two different groups of children with language impairment and to compare their performance with that of children learning language typically. Expressive use of tense-bearing and non-tense-related grammatical morphemes was explored. Children with specific language impairment (SLI), with Down syndrome (DS), and with typical language development (TL) were matched on mean length of utterance (MW). Performance was compared primarily on composite measures of tense, tense inflections, and non-tense morphemes, as well as on the Sentences subtest of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R; D. Wechsler, 1989). Exploratory analyses were completed on a set of 11 individual grammatical morphemes as a follow-up to the principal analyses. As predicted, the children with SLI performed significantly more poorly than the children with TL on all three composite measures. In addition, the DS group exhibited significantly weaker performance than did the TL group on the tense inflections and non-tense morpheme composites. Although there were no statistically reliable differences between the SLI and DS groups on any morpheme measure, the groups were not comparably weak in their use of the regular post, -ed; the irregular third person singular morphemes (e.g., has, does); the present progressive, -ing; or the use of modals. The SLI and DS groups both performed more poorly than did the TL group on the sentence imitation task.
本研究的目的是考察两组不同的语言障碍儿童的语法形态和句子模仿表现,并将他们的表现与正常学习语言的儿童进行比较。研究探讨了含时态和非时态相关语法语素的表达性使用情况。对患有特定语言障碍(SLI)、唐氏综合征(DS)和语言发展正常(TL)的儿童,根据平均语句长度(MW)进行匹配。主要比较了在时态、时态屈折变化和非时态语素的综合测量指标上的表现,以及韦氏学前和小学智力量表修订版(WPPSI-R;D. 韦克斯勒,1989)的句子子测验中的表现。作为主要分析的后续,对一组11个单独的语法语素进行了探索性分析。正如预期的那样,在所有三项综合测量指标上,患有SLI的儿童表现明显比TL组儿童差。此外,DS组在时态屈折变化和非时态语素综合指标上的表现明显弱于TL组。虽然在任何语素测量指标上,SLI组和DS组之间没有统计学上可靠的差异,但在使用规则的后置 -ed、不规则的第三人称单数语素(如has、does)、现在进行时 -ing或情态动词的使用方面,两组的薄弱程度并不相同。在句子模仿任务中,SLI组和DS组的表现都比TL组差。