Edwards B, Waterhouse J, Atkinson G, Reilly T
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Trueman Building, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool L3 2ET, UK.
J Sports Sci. 2002 Sep;20(9):725-32. doi: 10.1080/026404102320219437.
Seventeen healthy adults exercised for 30 min (70% VO2max), at different times of the day and night throughout a 24 h period. The effect on the phase of core temperature rhythm was assessed by comparing the rhythms on the day immediately before and immediately after the day of exercise with the participants living normally on these 2 days. Assessments were made upon data that had been corrected for the thermogenic effects of sleep and activity. When exercise was performed in the period between 4 h before and 1 h after the temperature minimum, there was a phase delay of 1.03 +/- 0.78 h (mean +/- s; n = 6); when performed between 3 and 8 h after the temperature minimum, there was a phase advance of 1.07 +/- 1.23 h (n = 9). Both means were significantly different from zero (Student's one-sample t-tests: P < 0.05). Performed at other times, exercise had no significant effect on the phase of the temperature rhythm. The phase changes were not significantly different from those previously observed by us in sedentary individuals exposed to domestic lighting. We conclude that the amount of physical activity has very little effect on the body clock.
17名健康成年人在24小时内的白天和夜晚不同时间进行了30分钟的锻炼(最大摄氧量的70%)。通过比较锻炼日前后一天的核心体温节律与这两天正常生活的参与者的节律,评估锻炼对核心体温节律相位的影响。评估是基于对睡眠和活动产热效应进行校正后的数据。当在体温最低点前4小时至最低点后1小时之间进行锻炼时,相位延迟为1.03±0.78小时(平均值±标准差;n = 6);当在体温最低点后3至8小时之间进行锻炼时,相位提前为1.07±1.23小时(n = 9)。两个平均值均与零有显著差异(学生单样本t检验:P < 0.05)。在其他时间进行锻炼,对体温节律的相位没有显著影响。这些相位变化与我们之前在暴露于家庭照明的久坐个体中观察到的变化没有显著差异。我们得出结论,体力活动量对生物钟的影响非常小。