Centre for Sleep Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Chronobiol Int. 2010 Jul;27(5):911-21. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.488901.
Previous forced desynchrony (FD) studies have shown that neurobehavioral function is affected by circadian phase and duration of prior wakefulness. There is some evidence that neuromuscular function may also be affected by circadian phase and prior wake, but these effects have not been systematically investigated. This study examined the effects of circadian phase and prior wake on two measures of neuromuscular function--postural balance (PB) and maximal grip strength (MGS)--using a 28-h FD protocol. Eleven male participants (mean +/- SD: 22.7 +/- 2.5 yr) lived in a sound-attenuated, light- and temperature-controlled time-isolation laboratory for 12 days. Following two training days and a baseline day, participants were scheduled to seven 28-h FD days, with the ratio between sleep opportunity and wake spans kept constant (i.e., 9.3 h sleep period and 18.7 h wake period). PB was measured during 1 min of quiet standing on a force platform. MGS of the dominant hand was measured using a dynamometer. These two measures were obtained every 2.5 h during wake. Core body temperature was continuously recorded with rectal thermistors to determine circadian phase. For both measures of neuromuscular function, individual data points were assigned a circadian phase and a level of prior wake. Data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with two within-subjects factors: circadian phase (six phases) and prior wake (seven levels). For MGS, there was a main effect of circadian phase, but no main effect of prior wake. For PB, there were no main effects of circadian phase or prior wake. There were no interactions between circadian phase and prior wake for MGS or PB. The significant effect of circadian phase on muscle strength is in agreement with previous reports in the literature. In terms of prior wake, both MGS and PB remained relatively stable across wake periods, indicating that neuromuscular function may be more robust than neurobehavioral function when the duration of wakefulness is within a normal range (i.e., 18.7 h).
先前的强制异步(FD)研究表明,神经行为功能受昼夜节律相位和先前清醒时间的影响。有一些证据表明,神经肌肉功能也可能受到昼夜节律相位和先前清醒的影响,但这些影响尚未得到系统研究。本研究使用 28 小时 FD 方案,检查了昼夜节律相位和先前清醒对两种神经肌肉功能测量值的影响——姿势平衡(PB)和最大握力(MGS)。11 名男性参与者(平均值±标准差:22.7±2.5 岁)在隔音、光和温度控制的时间隔离实验室中生活了 12 天。在进行了两天训练和一天基线测量后,参与者被安排进行了 7 天 28 小时 FD,保持睡眠机会和清醒跨度的比例不变(即 9.3 小时睡眠时间和 18.7 小时清醒时间)。在力平台上安静站立 1 分钟时测量 PB。使用测力计测量优势手的 MGS。这两个测量值在清醒时每 2.5 小时获得一次。使用直肠温度传感器连续记录核心体温以确定昼夜节律相位。对于神经肌肉功能的两个测量值,将每个个体数据点分配给昼夜节律相位和先前清醒水平。通过重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)对数据进行分析,有两个内源性因素:昼夜节律相位(六个相位)和先前清醒(七个水平)。对于 MGS,昼夜节律相位有主要影响,但先前清醒没有主要影响。对于 PB,昼夜节律相位或先前清醒都没有主要影响。对于 MGS 或 PB,昼夜节律相位和先前清醒之间没有相互作用。肌肉力量的昼夜节律相位的显著影响与文献中的先前报告一致。就先前的清醒而言,MGS 和 PB 在清醒期间保持相对稳定,这表明当清醒时间在正常范围内(即 18.7 小时)时,神经肌肉功能可能比神经行为功能更稳健。