Cranney Ann, Wells George, Willan Andrew, Griffith Lauren, Zytaruk Nicole, Robinson Vivian, Black Dennis, Adachi Jonathan, Shea Beverley, Tugwell Peter, Guyatt Gordon
Endocr Rev. 2002 Aug;23(4):508-16. doi: 10.1210/er.2001-2002.
To review the effect of alendronate on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Controlled trials registry from 1980 to 1999, and we examined citations of relevant articles and proceedings of international meetings.
We included 11 trials that randomized women to alendronate or placebo and measured bone density for at least 1 yr.
For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data.
The pooled relative risk (RR) for vertebral fractures in patients given 5 mg or more of alendronate was 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.65]. The RR of nonvertebral fractures in patients given 10 mg or more of alendronate was 0.51 (95% CI 0.38-0.69), an appreciably greater effect than for the 5 mg dose. We found a similar reduction in RR across nonvertebral fracture types; in particular, RR reductions for fractures traditionally thought to be "osteoporotic," such as hip and forearm, were very similar to RR reductions for "nonosteoporotic" fractures. Individual studies showed similar results, reflected in the P values of the test of heterogeneity (P = 0.99 for vertebral and 0.88 for nonvertebral fractures). Alendronate produced positive effects on the percentage change in bone density, which increased with both dose and time. After 3 yr of treatment with 10 mg of alendronate or more, the pooled estimate of the difference in percentage change between alendronate and placebo was 7.48% (95% CI 6.12-8.85) for the lumbar spine (2-3 yr), 5.60% (95% CI 4.80-6.39) for the hip (3-4 yr), 2.08% (95% CI 1.53-2.63) for the forearm (2-4 yr), and 2.73% (95% CI 2.27-3.20) for the total body (3 yr). Heterogeneity of the treatment effect of alendronate was not consistently explained by any of our a priori hypotheses; in particular, the effect was very similar in prevention and treatment studies. The pooled RR for discontinuing medication due to adverse effects for 5 mg or greater of alendronate was 1.15 (95% CI 0.93-1.42). The pooled RR for discontinuing medication due to gastro-intestinal (GI) side effects for 5 mg or greater was 1.03 (0.81-1.30, P = 0.83), and the pooled RR for GI adverse effects with continuation of medication was 1.03 (0.98 to 1.07) P = 0.23.
Alendronate increases bone density in both early postmenopausal women and those with established osteoporosis while reducing the rate of vertebral fracture over 2-3 yr of treatment. Reductions in nonvertebral fractures are evident among postmenopausal women without prevalent fractures and have bone mineral density (BMD) levels below the World Health Organization threshold for osteoporosis. The impact on fractures appears consistent across all fracture types, casting doubt on traditional distinctions between osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic fractures.
回顾阿仑膦酸盐对绝经后女性骨密度和骨折的影响。
我们检索了1980年至1999年的MEDLINE、EMBASE、《现刊目次》以及Cochrane对照试验注册库,并查阅了相关文章的参考文献以及国际会议论文集。
我们纳入了11项试验,这些试验将女性随机分为阿仑膦酸盐组或安慰剂组,并至少1年测量一次骨密度。
对于每项试验,由三名独立的评审员评估方法学质量并提取数据。
给予5毫克或更高剂量阿仑膦酸盐的患者发生椎体骨折的合并相对危险度(RR)为0.52[95%置信区间(CI),0.43 - 0.65]。给予10毫克或更高剂量阿仑膦酸盐的患者发生非椎体骨折的RR为0.51(95%CI 0.38 - 0.69),其效果明显大于5毫克剂量组。我们发现不同类型非椎体骨折的RR降低情况相似;特别是,传统上认为是“骨质疏松性”的骨折,如髋部和前臂骨折的RR降低与“非骨质疏松性”骨折的RR降低非常相似。个体研究显示出相似的结果,这在异质性检验的P值中得到体现(椎体骨折P = 0.99,非椎体骨折P = 0.88)。阿仑膦酸盐对骨密度的百分比变化产生了积极影响,且随着剂量和时间的增加而增加。用10毫克或更高剂量的阿仑膦酸盐治疗3年后,阿仑膦酸盐组与安慰剂组在百分比变化差异方面的合并估计值为:腰椎(2 - 3年)为7.48%(95%CI 6.12 - 8.85),髋部(3 - 4年)为5.60%(95%CI 4.80 - 6.39),前臂(2 - 4年)为2.08%(95%CI 1.53 - 2.63),全身(3年)为2.73%(95%CI 2.27 - 3.20)。我们预先设定的任何假设均未能始终如一地解释阿仑膦酸盐治疗效果的异质性;特别是,在预防和治疗研究中效果非常相似。因不良反应而停药的5毫克或更高剂量阿仑膦酸盐的合并RR为1.15(95%CI 0.93 - 1.42)。因胃肠道(GI)副作用而停药的5毫克或更高剂量的合并RR为1.03(0.81 - 1.30,P = 0.83),继续用药时胃肠道不良反应的合并RR为1.03(0.98至1.07),P = 0.23。
阿仑膦酸盐可增加绝经早期女性以及已患骨质疏松症女性的骨密度,同时在2 - 3年的治疗期间降低椎体骨折发生率。在无既往骨折且骨矿物质密度(BMD)水平低于世界卫生组织骨质疏松症阈值的绝经后女性中,非椎体骨折发生率也明显降低。对所有骨折类型的骨折影响似乎是一致的,这对骨质疏松性骨折和非骨质疏松性骨折之间的传统区分提出了质疑。