Robinson C M, Royds M, Abraham A, McQueen M M, Court-Brown C M, Christie J
Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Sep;84(9):1528-33. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200209000-00004.
Individuals who sustain a low-energy fracture are at increased risk of sustaining a subsequent low-energy fracture. The incidence of these refractures may be reduced by secondary preventative measures, although justifying such interventions and evaluating their impact is difficult without substantive evidence of the severity of the refracture risk. The aim of this study was to quantify the risk of sustaining another fracture following a low-energy fracture compared with the risk in an age and sex-matched reference population.
During the twelve-year period between January 1988 and December 1999, all inpatient and outpatient fracture-treatment events were prospectively audited in a trauma unit that is the sole source of fracture treatment for a well-defined local catchment population. During this time, 22,060 patients at least forty-five years of age who had sustained a total of 22,494 low-energy fractures of the hip, wrist, proximal part of the humerus, or ankle were identified. All refracture events were linked to the index fracture in the database during the twelve-year period. The incidence of refracture in the cohort of patients who had sustained a previous fracture was divided by the "background" incidence of index fractures within the same local population to obtain the relative risk of refracture. Person-years at-risk methodology was used to control for the effect of the expected increase in mortality with advancing age.
Within the cohort, 2913 patients (13.2%) subsequently sustained a total of 3024 refractures during the twelve-year period. Patients with a previous low-energy fracture had a relative risk of 3.89 of sustaining a subsequent low-energy fracture. The relative risk was significantly increased for both sexes, but it was greater for men (relative risk = 5.55) than it was for women (relative risk = 2.94). The relative risk was 5.23 in the youngest age cohort (patients between forty-five and forty-nine years of age), and it decreased with increasing age to 1.20 in the oldest cohort (patients at least eighty-five years of age).
Individuals who sustain a low-energy fracture between the ages of forty-five and eighty-four years have an increased relative risk of sustaining another low-energy fracture. This increased risk was greater when the index fracture occurred earlier in life; the risk decreased with advancing age. Secondary preventative measures designed to reduce the risk of refracture following a low-energy fracture are likely to have a greater impact on younger individuals.
发生低能量骨折的个体再次发生低能量骨折的风险增加。二级预防措施可能会降低这些再骨折的发生率,然而,在缺乏关于再骨折风险严重程度的确凿证据的情况下,证明此类干预措施的合理性并评估其影响是困难的。本研究的目的是量化与年龄和性别匹配的参考人群相比,低能量骨折后再次发生骨折的风险。
在1988年1月至1999年12月的12年期间,对一家创伤科的所有住院和门诊骨折治疗事件进行了前瞻性审核,该创伤科是一个明确界定的当地集水区人群骨折治疗的唯一来源。在此期间,确定了22060名至少45岁的患者,他们共发生了22494例髋部、腕部、肱骨近端或踝部的低能量骨折。在12年期间,所有再骨折事件都与数据库中的索引骨折相关联。将先前发生过骨折的患者队列中的再骨折发生率除以同一当地人群中索引骨折的“背景”发生率,以获得再骨折的相对风险。采用人年风险方法来控制随着年龄增长预期死亡率增加的影响。
在该队列中,2913名患者(13.2%)在12年期间随后共发生了3024例再骨折。先前发生过低能量骨折的患者再次发生低能量骨折的相对风险为3.89。男女的相对风险均显著增加,但男性(相对风险=5.55)高于女性(相对风险=2.94)。最年轻年龄组(45至49岁的患者)的相对风险为5.23,随着年龄的增长,该风险在最年长组(至少85岁的患者)中降至1.20。
45至84岁发生低能量骨折的个体再次发生低能量骨折的相对风险增加。当索引骨折发生在生命早期时,这种增加的风险更大;风险随着年龄的增长而降低。旨在降低低能量骨折后再骨折风险的二级预防措施可能对年轻个体产生更大的影响。