Sabroe Ruth A, Fiebiger Edda, Francis David M, Maurer Dieter, Seed Paul T, Grattan Clive E h, Black Anne Kobza, Stingl Georg, Greaves Malcolm W, Barr Robert M
St John's Institute of Dermatology and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Sep;110(3):492-9. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.126782.
Circulating autoantibodies against FcepsilonRI, IgE, or both occur in approximately one third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), but not all autoantibodies initiate histamine release.
We sought to classify patients with CIU into subsets on the basis of serum bioactivity and immunoreactivity and to examine the relationship between newly defined subtype and disease severity.
Sera from patients with CIU (n = 78), dermog-raphism (n = 15), and cholinergic urticaria (n = 10) and sera from healthy subjects (n = 39) were analyzed by means of Western blot analysis for anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies and for histamine release from basophils and dermal mast cells. In vivo reactivity of autologous serum was tested by means of intradermal injection, and CIU severity was determined on the basis of clinical interview.
We classified sera from patients with CIU into 5 subsets: immunoreactive histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies (n = 20 [26%]); immunoreactive anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies without histamine-releasing activity (n = 12 [15%]); anti-IgE-like autoantibodies (n = 7 [9%]); serum containing a mast cell-specific histamine-releasing factor (n = 7 [9%]); and sera with no identifiable factor (n = 32 [41%]). Patients with serum histamine-releasing activity had more severe urticaria than patients without such activity. Positive skin test responses to autologous sera were associated with histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies but not with non-histamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies. Neither healthy subjects nor patients with dermographism or cholinergic urticaria had his-tamine-releasing anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies.
These data support the specificity of functional anti-FcepsilonRI autoantibodies to CIU. The identification of distinctive subsets of patients suggests that other pathogenic mechanisms occur in CIU in addition to direct ligation of FcepsilonRI by autoantibodies causing dermal mast cell degranulation. Elucidating these mechanisms might lead to new treatments for CIU.
慢性特发性荨麻疹(CIU)患者中约三分之一存在针对FcepsilonRI、IgE或两者的循环自身抗体,但并非所有自身抗体都会引发组胺释放。
我们试图根据血清生物活性和免疫反应性将CIU患者分类为不同亚组,并研究新定义的亚型与疾病严重程度之间的关系。
通过蛋白质印迹分析检测CIU患者(n = 78)、皮肤划痕症患者(n = 15)、胆碱能性荨麻疹患者(n = 10)以及健康受试者(n = 39)血清中的抗FcepsilonRI自身抗体,以及嗜碱性粒细胞和皮肤肥大细胞释放组胺的情况。通过皮内注射检测自体血清的体内反应性,并根据临床访谈确定CIU的严重程度。
我们将CIU患者的血清分为5个亚组:具有免疫反应性且能释放组胺的抗FcepsilonRI自身抗体(n = 20 [26%]);具有免疫反应性但无组胺释放活性的抗FcepsilonRI自身抗体(n = 12 [15%]);抗IgE样自身抗体(n = 7 [9%]);含有肥大细胞特异性组胺释放因子的血清(n = 7 [9%]);以及未发现可识别因子的血清(n = 32 [41%])。具有血清组胺释放活性的患者荨麻疹比无此活性的患者更严重。对自体血清皮肤试验呈阳性反应与能释放组胺的抗FcepsilonRI自身抗体相关,但与不能释放组胺的抗FcepsilonRI自身抗体无关。健康受试者、皮肤划痕症患者或胆碱能性荨麻疹患者均无能释放组胺的抗FcepsilonRI自身抗体。
这些数据支持功能性抗FcepsilonRI自身抗体对CIU的特异性。对不同患者亚组的识别表明,除了自身抗体直接结合FcepsilonRI导致皮肤肥大细胞脱颗粒外,CIU还存在其他致病机制。阐明这些机制可能会带来CIU的新治疗方法。