Podzamczer Daniel, Ferrer Elena, Consiglio Ezequiel, Gatell José Mariá, Perez Pepa, Perez José Luis, Luna Elena, González Alicia, Pedrol Enric, Lozano Luisa, Ocaña Imma, Llibre Josep María, Casiró Arnaldo, Aranda Miquel, Barrufet Pilar, Martínez-Lacasa Javier, Miró José María, Badía Xavier, Casado Alfonso, Lupo Sergio, Cahn Pedro, Maños Manel, Estela Jordi
Infectious Disease Service, Ciutat Sanitària de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain.
Antivir Ther. 2002 Jun;7(2):81-90.
Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing regimens may be a valid alternative to protease inhibitor-containing regimens for initial antiretroviral therapy, but to date few studies comparing these two strategies have been performed.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nelfinavir or nevirapine associated to zidovudine/lamivudine in HIV-infected naive patients.
Randomized, open-label, multicentre trial.
Twelve centres in Spain (9) and Argentina (3).
One hundred and forty-two HIV-infected naive patients without AIDS.
Patients received combivir (zidovudine 300 mg/lamivudine 150 mg, twice-daily) plus either nelfinavir (1250 mg) twice-daily (zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir, n=70) or nevirapine (200 mg) twice-daily (zidovudine/lamivudine/nevirapine, n=72), and were followed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL) of less than 200 copies/ml by PCR at 12 months. pVL of less than 20 copies/ml (PCR), changes in CD4 counts, clinical progression and adverse events were also evaluated. Efficacy was assessed using intent-to-treat (ITT) (missing=failure) and on-treatment analysis.
At 12 months in the ITT analysis the proportion of patients with pVL below 200 copies/ml was 60% (95% CI 48.5-71.5) in the zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir arm and 75% (95% CI 65-85) in the zidovudine/lamivudine/nevirapine arm (P=0.06), and the proportion below 20 copies/ml was 50% (95% CI 38.3-61.7) and 65% (95% CI 54.2-76.2), respectively (P=0.06). No differences were found when comparing the subgroup of patients with baseline pVL of more than 100,000 copies/ml. A gain of +173 and +162 CD4 cells/mm3, respectively, was observed. Zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir was discontinued in 21% of patients, and zidovudine/lamivudine/nevirapine in 25%, due to toxicity (P>0.2).
Our results suggest that zidovudine/lamivudine/nevirapine is at least as effective as zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir as first-line therapy for HIV disease.
含非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂的治疗方案可能是含蛋白酶抑制剂治疗方案用于初始抗逆转录病毒治疗的有效替代方案,但迄今为止,比较这两种策略的研究很少。
评估奈非那韦或奈韦拉平联合齐多夫定/拉米夫定用于初治HIV感染患者的疗效和安全性。
随机、开放标签、多中心试验。
西班牙的12个中心(9个)和阿根廷的3个中心。
142例未患艾滋病的初治HIV感染患者。
患者接受双汰芝(齐多夫定300mg/拉米夫定150mg,每日两次)加奈非那韦(1250mg)每日两次(齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈非那韦,n = 70)或奈韦拉平(200mg)每日两次(齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈韦拉平,n = 72),并随访12个月。主要终点是12个月时通过PCR检测血浆HIV-1 RNA(pVL)低于200拷贝/ml的患者比例。还评估了pVL低于20拷贝/ml(PCR)、CD4细胞计数变化、临床进展和不良事件。使用意向性分析(ITT)(缺失=失败)和治疗中分析评估疗效。
在ITT分析中,12个月时,齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈非那韦组pVL低于200拷贝/ml的患者比例为60%(95%CI 48.5 - 71.5),齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈韦拉平组为75%(95%CI 65 - 85)(P = 0.06),低于20拷贝/ml的比例分别为50%(95%CI 38.3 - 61.7)和65%(95%CI 54.2 - 76.2)(P = 0.06)。比较基线pVL超过100,000拷贝/ml的患者亚组时未发现差异。分别观察到CD4细胞/mm³增加173个和162个。由于毒性,21%的患者停用了齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈非那韦,25%的患者停用了齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈韦拉平(P>0.2)。
我们的结果表明,齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈韦拉平作为HIV疾病的一线治疗至少与齐多夫定/拉米夫定/奈非那韦一样有效。