Troncy Eric, Junot Stéphane, Keroack Stéphanie, Sammut Vèronique, Pibarot Philippe, Genevois Jean-Pierre, Cuvelliez Sophie
Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Sep 1;221(5):666-72. doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.221.666.
To determine prevalence of adverse effects associated with epidural administration of morphine with or without bupivacaine in dogs and cats undergoing surgery and evaluate effects of epidural administration of morphine on postoperative pain severity.
Retrospective study.
242 dogs and 23 cats.
Morphine with or without bupivacaine was administered prior to surgery with a Tuohy needle, spinal needle, or epidural catheter. In 18 dogs that underwent surgery twice, results of preemptive epidural administration of morphine with or without bupivacaine were compared with results of systemic administration of oxymorphone and ketoprofen.
The delivered fraction of isoflurane was significantly lower in animals given morphine and bupivacaine than in animals given morphine alone. Analgesia was of significantly longer duration in dogs given morphine and bupivacaine than in dogs given morphine alone. During anesthesia, mild respiratory and cardiovascular depression was reported. Seven dogs and 2 cats had urine retention, and 2 dogs developed pruritus. Six dogs vomited when a second dose of morphine was given epidurally the day after surgery. Eight of 72 dogs had delayed hair growth. In 18 dogs that underwent surgery twice, the delivered fraction of isoflurane was significantly lower and the duration of analgesia was significantly longer when morphine with or without bupivacaine was given epidurally than when oxymorphone and ketoprofen were given.
Results suggest that preemptive epidural administration of morphine with or without bupivacaine is a safe and effective method of inducing long-lasting analgesia in dogs and cats and is superior to standard management of postoperative pain with repeated injection of oxymorphone and ketoprofen.
确定在接受手术的犬猫中,硬膜外给予吗啡联合或不联合布比卡因时不良反应的发生率,并评估硬膜外给予吗啡对术后疼痛严重程度的影响。
回顾性研究。
242只犬和23只猫。
在手术前用Tuohy针、脊髓针或硬膜外导管给予吗啡联合或不联合布比卡因。对18只接受两次手术的犬,将预先硬膜外给予吗啡联合或不联合布比卡因的结果与静脉给予羟吗啡酮和酮洛芬的结果进行比较。
给予吗啡和布比卡因的动物异氟烷的吸入比例显著低于仅给予吗啡的动物。给予吗啡和布比卡因的犬的镇痛持续时间显著长于仅给予吗啡的犬。麻醉期间,报告有轻度呼吸和心血管抑制。7只犬和2只猫出现尿潴留,2只犬出现瘙痒。6只犬在术后第二天硬膜外给予第二剂吗啡时呕吐。72只犬中有8只出现毛发生长延迟。在18只接受两次手术的犬中,硬膜外给予含或不含布比卡因的吗啡时,异氟烷的吸入比例显著降低,镇痛持续时间显著长于给予羟吗啡酮和酮洛芬时。
结果表明,预先硬膜外给予含或不含布比卡因的吗啡是在犬猫中诱导长效镇痛的一种安全有效的方法,优于反复注射羟吗啡酮和酮洛芬的术后疼痛标准管理方法。