Callahan Christopher M, Unverzagt Frederick W, Hui Siu L, Perkins Anthony J, Hendrie Hugh C
Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis 46202, USA.
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9):771-81. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00007.
To design a brief cognitive screener with acceptable sensitivity and specificity for identifying subjects with cognitive impairment.
Cohort one is assembled from a community-based survey coupled with a second-stage diagnostic evaluation using formal diagnostic criteria for dementia. Cohort two is assembled from referrals to a specialty clinic for dementing disorders that completed the same diagnostic evaluation.
Urban neighborhoods in Indianapolis, Indiana and the Indiana Alzheimer Disease Center.
Cohort one consists of 344 community-dwelling black persons identified from a random sample of 2212 black persons aged 65 and older residing in Indianapolis; cohort two consists of 651 subject referrals to the Alzheimer Disease Center.
Formal diagnostic clinical assessments for dementia including scores on the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE), a six-item screener derived from the MMSE, the Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (BDRS), and the Word List Recall. Based on clinical evaluations, subjects were categorized as no cognitive impairment, cognitive impairment-not demented, or demented.
The mean age of the community-based sample was 74.4 years, 59.4% of the sample were women, and the mean years of education was 10.1. The prevalence of dementia in this sample was 4.3% and the prevalence of cognitive impairment was 24.6%. Using a cut-off of three or more errors, the sensitivity and specificity of the six-item screener for a diagnosis of dementia was 88.7 and 88.0, respectively. In the same sample, the corresponding sensitivity and specificity for the MMSE using a cut-off score of 23 was 95.2 and 86.7. The performance of the two scales was comparable across the two populations studied and using either cognitive impairment or dementia as the gold standard. An increasing number of errors on the six-item screener is highly correlated with poorer scores on longer measures of cognitive impairment.
The six-item screener is a brief and reliable instrument for identifying subjects with cognitive impairment and its diagnostic properties are comparable to the full MMSE. It can be administered by telephone or face-to-face interview and is easily scored by a simple summation of errors.
设计一种简短的认知筛查工具,其具有可接受的敏感性和特异性,用于识别认知障碍患者。
队列一由基于社区的调查以及使用痴呆症正式诊断标准的第二阶段诊断评估组成。队列二由转介至痴呆症专科诊所并完成相同诊断评估的患者组成。
印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯的城市社区以及印第安纳州阿尔茨海默病中心。
队列一由从居住在印第安纳波利斯的2212名65岁及以上黑人的随机样本中识别出的344名社区居住黑人组成;队列二由651名转介至阿尔茨海默病中心的患者组成。
痴呆症的正式诊断临床评估,包括简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分、从MMSE衍生的六项筛查工具得分、Blessed痴呆评定量表(BDRS)得分以及单词表回忆得分。根据临床评估,将受试者分类为无认知障碍、认知障碍但未患痴呆症或患痴呆症。
基于社区的样本的平均年龄为74.4岁,样本中59.4%为女性,平均受教育年限为10.1年。该样本中痴呆症的患病率为4.3%,认知障碍的患病率为24.6%。使用三个或更多错误作为临界值,六项筛查工具诊断痴呆症的敏感性和特异性分别为88.7和88.0。在同一样本中,使用临界值23时MMSE的相应敏感性和特异性分别为95.2和86.7。在所研究的两个人群中,以认知障碍或痴呆症作为金标准时,这两种量表的表现相当。六项筛查工具上错误数量的增加与认知障碍更长测量指标上的较差得分高度相关。
六项筛查工具是一种简短且可靠的识别认知障碍患者的工具,其诊断特性与完整的MMSE相当。它可以通过电话或面对面访谈进行施测,并且通过简单地累加错误很容易计分。