Dworkin Samuel F, Sherman Jeffrey, Mancl Lloyd, Ohrbach Richard, LeResche Linda, Truelove Edmond
Departments of Oral Medicine and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Box 356370, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Orofac Pain. 2002;16(3):207-20.
To analyze the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain scales comprising the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis II.
Data resulting from independent longitudinal and cross-sectional epidemiological studies as well as randomized clinical trials conducted at the University of Washington and the University at Buffalo were submitted to descriptive, correlational, and inferential statistical analyses to evaluate selected psychometric properties of the RDC/TMD Axis II scales.
Analyses of available data from both TMD clinical centers revealed good to excellent reliability, validity, and clinical utility for the Axis II measures of depression, somatization, and graded chronic pain. Specifically, data were presented comparing the RDC/TMD depression scale to the Beck Depression Inventory and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; these data supported concurrent validity of the RDC/TMD measure and its use as a depression screening tool. Its clinical utility lies in its demonstrated usefulness for alerting TMD clinicians to potentially noteworthy depressive symptomatology in TMD patients. Others have shown that elevated somatization, the tendency to report non-specific physical symptoms as noxious or troublesome, is a predictor of poor TMD treatment outcome. The present analyses demonstrated that the RDC/TMD Axis II non-specific physical symptoms scale has acceptable reliability and that severe levels of somatization can potentially confound interpretation of the Axis I clinical examination. The graded chronic pain scale was demonstrated to have clinical utility for tailoring TMD treatment to levels of a patient's psychosocial adaptation.
The major RDC/TMD Axis II measures demonstrate psychometric properties suitable for comprehensive assessment and management of TMD patients.
分析颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)轴II中抑郁、非特异性躯体症状和慢性疼痛分级量表的信度、效度及临床实用性。
将华盛顿大学和布法罗大学开展的独立纵向和横断面流行病学研究以及随机临床试验所得到的数据进行描述性、相关性和推断性统计分析,以评估RDC/TMD轴II量表的选定心理测量特性。
对两个颞下颌关节紊乱病临床中心的现有数据进行分析,结果显示轴II中抑郁、躯体化和慢性疼痛分级测量具有良好至极优的信度、效度及临床实用性。具体而言,给出了将RDC/TMD抑郁量表与贝克抑郁量表及流行病学研究中心抑郁量表进行比较的数据;这些数据支持了RDC/TMD测量的同时效度及其作为抑郁筛查工具的用途。其临床实用性在于它已被证明有助于提醒颞下颌关节紊乱病临床医生注意颞下颌关节紊乱病患者潜在的值得关注的抑郁症状。其他人已表明,躯体化程度升高,即将非特异性躯体症状报告为有害或麻烦的倾向,是颞下颌关节紊乱病治疗效果不佳的一个预测指标。目前的分析表明,RDC/TMD轴II非特异性躯体症状量表具有可接受的信度,且严重的躯体化水平可能会混淆对轴I临床检查结果的解释。慢性疼痛分级量表被证明在根据患者心理社会适应水平调整颞下颌关节紊乱病治疗方案方面具有临床实用性。
RDC/TMD轴II的主要测量指标显示出适用于全面评估和管理颞下颌关节紊乱病患者的心理测量特性。