Braun Juergen, Sieper Joachim
Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.
Arthritis Res. 2002;4(5):307-21. doi: 10.1186/ar592. Epub 2002 Aug 6.
Therapeutic options for patients with more severe forms of spondyloarthritis (SpA) have been rather limited in recent decades. There is accumulating evidence that anti-tumor-necrosis-factor (anti-TNF) therapy is highly effective in SpA, especially in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. The major anti-TNF-alpha agents currently available, infliximab (Remicade(R)) and etanercept (Enbrel(R)), are approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in many countries. In ankylosing spondylitis there is an unmet medical need, since there are almost no disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) available for severely affected patients, especially those with spinal manifestations. Judging from recent data from more than 300 patients with SpA, anti-TNF therapy seems to be even more effective in SpA than in rheumatoid arthritis. However, it remains to be shown whether patients benefit from long-term treatment, whether radiological progression and ankylosis can be stopped and whether long-term biologic therapy is safe.
近几十年来,针对更严重形式的脊柱关节炎(SpA)患者的治疗选择相当有限。越来越多的证据表明,抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)疗法在SpA中非常有效,尤其是在强直性脊柱炎和银屑病关节炎中。目前可用的主要抗TNF-α药物英夫利昔单抗(Remicade®)和依那西普(Enbrel®)在许多国家被批准用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)。在强直性脊柱炎中,存在未满足的医疗需求,因为几乎没有可用于重度受累患者,尤其是有脊柱表现患者的改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)。从最近300多名SpA患者的数据来看,抗TNF疗法在SpA中似乎比在类风湿关节炎中更有效。然而,患者是否能从长期治疗中获益、放射学进展和关节强直是否能被阻止以及长期生物治疗是否安全仍有待证实。