Bosk Charles L
Department of Sociology, Center for Bioethics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023957.23565.E9.
Voluntary informed consent is a hard problem--one that inheres in the domain of research. The standard definition requires four criteria for consent to be morally valid: disclosure, understanding, voluntariness, and competence. These standards apply across the continuum of activities that comprise research. This paper concentrates on consent for the desperately sick, for whom enrollment in a research trial represents the last best hope of rescue. The literature indicates that many of these subjects enroll in research on the basis of feelings of hope or trust. This finding bypasses the careful weighing of risks and benefits that the model of informed consent is based upon. This paper explores how the requirements of candor need to be balanced with those of kindness.
自愿知情同意是一个棘手的问题——这是研究领域固有的问题。标准定义要求同意在道德上有效需满足四个标准:披露、理解、自愿和行为能力。这些标准适用于构成研究的一系列活动。本文着重探讨绝症患者的同意问题,对他们而言,参加一项研究试验是最后的最佳获救希望。文献表明,这些受试者中的许多人是基于希望或信任的感觉而参加研究的。这一发现忽略了知情同意模式所基于的对风险和益处的审慎权衡。本文探讨了坦诚的要求需要如何与善意的要求相平衡。