Wang Bin, Luo Fei, Ge Xue-Cai, Fu Ai-Hua, Han Ji-Sheng
Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, 100083, Beijing, China.
Brain Res. 2002 Sep 20;950(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02980-3.
We have previously shown with a model of morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) that a brief exposure to footshock stress or a priming dose of morphine could reactivate drug-seeking behavior after a long drug-free period. The present study was designed to examine the possible role of certain brain areas in such a reactivation. After the rats were successfully trained with morphine (4 mg/kg, i.p.) through a CPP paradigm (10 sessions of daily pairing of morphine with one of the two compartments), different parts of nucleus accumbens (NAc), ventral tegmental area (VTA), and central (Ce) or lateral (La) nucleus of amygdala were lesioned with a DC current passing through the respective location. After a 9-day abstinence period, random intermittent footshock (DC square wave, 0.5 mA, 0.5 s width, off time 10-70 s) or drug priming (morphine 0.25 mg/kg, s.c.) reactivated the place preference in sham lesion rats. However, the effect of drug priming could be completely abolished by lesions placed either at VTA, or the majority or shell part, but not the core of NAc. On the other hand, the effect of footshock stressor could be eliminated by a lesion placed at Ce but not La. These results suggest that, while both drug priming and footshock stress are effective in reactivating drug-seeking behavior, they might work through different neurochemical mechanisms and anatomical pathways.
我们之前用吗啡诱导的条件性位置偏爱(CPP)模型表明,短暂暴露于足底电击应激或给予吗啡的启动剂量,可在长时间无药期后重新激活觅药行为。本研究旨在探讨某些脑区在这种重新激活过程中可能发挥的作用。大鼠通过CPP范式(每天将吗啡与两个隔室之一配对10次)成功接受吗啡(4mg/kg,腹腔注射)训练后,通过在伏隔核(NAc)、腹侧被盖区(VTA)以及杏仁核中央(Ce)或外侧(La)核的不同部位施加直流电,对这些部位进行损伤。在9天的戒断期后,随机间歇性足底电击(直流方波,0.5mA,0.5s宽度,关闭时间10 - 70s)或药物启动(吗啡0.25mg/kg,皮下注射)可重新激活假损伤大鼠的位置偏爱。然而,药物启动的作用可被VTA或NAc大部分或壳部而非核心部位的损伤完全消除。另一方面,足底电击应激源的作用可被Ce而非La部位的损伤消除。这些结果表明,虽然药物启动和足底电击应激在重新激活觅药行为方面均有效,但它们可能通过不同的神经化学机制和解剖学通路发挥作用。