Suppr超能文献

研究机构与期刊在研究诚信案件方面的合作:出版伦理委员会(COPE)的指导。

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

机构信息

Sideview, Princes Risborough, UK.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2012 Jun;72(2):165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

Abstract

Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is therefore important for institutions and journals to communicate and collaborate effectively on cases relating to research integrity. To achieve this, we make the following recommendations. Institutions should: • have a research integrity officer (or office) and publish their contact details prominently; • inform journals about cases of proven misconduct that affect the reliability or attribution of work that they have published; • respond to journals if they request information about issues, such as disputed authorship, misleading reporting, competing interests, or other factors, including honest errors, that could affect the reliability of published work; • initiate inquiries into allegations of research misconduct or unacceptable publication practice raised by journals; • have policies supporting responsible research conduct and systems in place for investigating suspected research misconduct. Journals should: • publish the contact details of their editor-in-chief who should act as the point of contact for questions relating to research and publication integrity; • inform institutions if they suspect misconduct by their researchers, and provide evidence to support these concerns; • cooperate with investigations and respond to institutions' questions about misconduct allegations; • be prepared to issue retractions or corrections (according to the COPE guidelines on retractions) when provided with findings of misconduct arising from investigations; • have policies for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate cases of research misconduct.

摘要

机构和期刊在研究和出版不端行为方面都有重要职责。机构负责其研究人员的行为,并鼓励健康的研究环境。期刊负责其编辑的行为,维护研究记录,并确保其发表的所有内容的可靠性。因此,机构和期刊就涉及研究诚信的案件进行有效沟通和协作非常重要。为此,我们提出以下建议。机构应:

  • 设立研究诚信官员(或办公室),并醒目地公布其联系方式;

  • 将影响其已发表作品可靠性或归因的已证实的不当行为案件告知期刊;

  • 如果期刊要求提供有关问题的信息,例如有争议的作者身份、误导性报告、利益冲突或其他因素(包括诚实错误),这些因素可能会影响已发表作品的可靠性,应作出回应;

  • 对期刊提出的有关研究不端行为或不可接受的出版实践的指控进行调查;

  • 制定支持负责任的研究行为的政策,并建立调查涉嫌研究不端行为的制度。期刊应:

  • 公布总编辑的联系方式,总编辑应作为与研究和出版诚信相关问题的联系人;

  • 如果怀疑其研究人员有不当行为,应通知机构,并提供证据支持这些关切;

  • 配合调查,并回应机构对不当行为指控的问题;

  • 准备在收到调查结果表明存在不当行为时,根据 COPE 关于撤回的指南发布撤回或更正(根据 COPE 关于撤回的指南);

  • 制定针对调查研究不端行为的机构和其他组织的回应政策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验