Meurer Steven J, Rubio Doris McGartland, Counte Michael A, Burroughs Tom
Saint Louis University's School of Public Health, USA.
Hosp Top. 2002 Spring;80(2):7-13. doi: 10.1080/00185860209597989.
Current methods of measuring continuous quality improvement (CQI) implementation are too long and not comprehensive. A new survey for CQI implementation was developed and tested for content validity using a panel of 8 experts--7 from the United States and 1 from England. The survey was reduced from 70 items to 22. The resultant survey had a clarity interrater agreement (IR) of .91, a representativeness IR of .93, a clarity content validity index (CVI) of .73, and a representativeness CVI of .91. Content validity served as an excellent data reduction method in building a valid, concise, and comprehensive measure of CQI implementation.
目前用于衡量持续质量改进(CQI)实施情况的方法耗时过长且不够全面。针对CQI实施情况开发了一项新的调查,并由一个由8名专家组成的小组进行内容效度测试,其中7名来自美国,1名来自英国。该调查从70项减少到了22项。最终的调查在清晰度方面的评分者间一致性(IR)为0.91,代表性方面的IR为0.93,清晰度内容效度指数(CVI)为0.73,代表性CVI为0.91。内容效度在构建一个有效、简洁且全面的CQI实施衡量标准方面是一种出色的数据精简方法。