Suppr超能文献

根据质量改进系统的“成熟度”对医院进行区分:欧洲医院样本中的一种新分类方案。

Differentiating between hospitals according to the "maturity" of quality improvement systems: a new classification scheme in a sample of European hospitals.

作者信息

Lombarts M J M H, Rupp I, Vallejo P, Klazinga N S, Suñol R

机构信息

Academic Medical Center, Department of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i38-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029389.

Abstract

AIM

This study, part of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) research project focusing on cross-border patients in Europe, investigated quality policies and improvement in healthcare systems across the European Union (EU). The aim was to develop a classification scheme for the level of quality improvement (maturity) in EU hospitals, in order to evaluate hospitals according to the maturity of their quality improvement activities.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire survey designed to measure quality improvement in EU hospitals was used as the basis for the classification scheme. Items included for the development of an evaluation tool--the maturity index--were considered important contributors to quality improvement. The four-stage quality cycle (plan, do, check and act) was used to determine the level of maturity of the various items. Psychometric properties of the classification scheme were assessed, and validation analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 389 hospitals participated in a questionnaire survey; response rates varied by country. For a final sample of 349 hospitals, it was possible to construct a quality improvement maturity index which consisted of seven domains and 113 items. The results of independent analyses sustained the validity of the index, which was useful in differentiating between hospitals in the research sample according to the maturity of their quality improvement system (defined as the total of all quality improvement activities).

DISCUSSION

Further research is recommended to develop an instrument which for use in the future as a practical tool to evaluate the maturity of hospital quality improvement systems.

摘要

目的

本研究是评估质量改进策略方法(MARQuIS)研究项目的一部分,聚焦于欧洲的跨境患者,旨在调查欧盟各国医疗体系的质量政策与改进情况。其目的是制定一套针对欧盟医院质量改进水平(成熟度)的分类方案,以便根据医院质量改进活动的成熟度对其进行评估。

方法

一项旨在衡量欧盟医院质量改进情况的基于网络的问卷调查被用作分类方案的基础。用于开发评估工具——成熟度指数的项目被视为质量改进的重要贡献因素。采用四阶段质量循环(计划、执行、检查和行动)来确定各个项目的成熟度水平。对分类方案的心理测量特性进行了评估,并开展了验证分析。

结果

共有389家医院参与了问卷调查;各国的回复率有所不同。对于最终选取的349家医院样本,构建了一个由七个领域和113个项目组成的质量改进成熟度指数。独立分析结果证实了该指数的有效性,它有助于根据研究样本中医院质量改进体系(定义为所有质量改进活动的总和)的成熟度对医院进行区分。

讨论

建议开展进一步研究以开发一种工具,供未来作为评估医院质量改进体系成熟度的实用工具使用。

相似文献

2
Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i28-37. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029363.
5
Impact of quality strategies on hospital outputs.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i62-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029439.
7
Implementation of patient safety strategies in European hospitals.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i57-61. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029413.
8
Cross-border care and healthcare quality improvement in Europe: the MARQuIS research project.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029678.
9
Development and validation of an index to assess hospital quality management systems.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-26. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu021. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
DUQuE quality management measures: associations between quality management at hospital and pathway levels.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu020. Epub 2014 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

2
Contribution of Healthcare Professionals in Issues that Relate to Quality Management.
Mater Sociomed. 2021 Mar;33(1):45-50. doi: 10.5455/msm.2021.33.45-50.
6
Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital.
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jul 27;8(3):174-82. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n3p174.
7
Implementation of patient safety and patient-centeredness strategies in Iranian hospitals.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108831. eCollection 2014.
8
Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe (DUQuE): overview of a study of hospital quality management in seven countries.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):5-15. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu025. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
9
Development and validation of an index to assess hospital quality management systems.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):16-26. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu021. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
DUQuE quality management measures: associations between quality management at hospital and pathway levels.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):66-73. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu020. Epub 2014 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Do European hospitals have quality and safety governance systems and structures in place?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i51-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029306.
2
Cross-border care and healthcare quality improvement in Europe: the MARQuIS research project.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029678.
3
Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i28-37. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029363.
4
National quality improvement policies and strategies in European healthcare systems.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i22-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029355.
6
The implementation of quality management systems in hospitals: a comparison between three countries.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 11;6:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-50.
7
Health promotion in hospitals--a strategy to improve quality in health care.
Eur J Public Health. 2005 Feb;15(1):6-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki100.
8
A framework for institutionalizing quality assurance.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Dec;14 Suppl 1:67-73. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.suppl_1.67.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验