• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量改进策略在389家欧洲医院中的应用:MARQuIS项目的结果。

Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project.

作者信息

Lombarts M J M H, Rupp I, Vallejo P, Suñol R, Klazinga N S

机构信息

Academic Medical Center, Department of Social Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i28-37. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029363.

DOI:10.1136/qshc.2008.029363
PMID:19188458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3269892/
Abstract

CONTEXT

This study was part of the Methods of Assessing Response to Quality Improvement Strategies (MARQuIS) research project investigating the impact of quality improvement strategies on hospital care in various countries of the European Union (EU), in relation to specific needs of cross-border patients.

AIM

This paper describes how EU hospitals have applied seven quality improvement strategies previously defined by the MARQuIS study: organisational quality management programmes; systems for obtaining patients' views; patient safety systems; audit and internal assessment of clinical standards; clinical and practice guidelines; performance indicators; and external assessment.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire was used to survey acute care hospitals in eight EU countries. The reported findings were later validated via on-site survey and site visits in a sample of the participating hospitals. Data collection took place from April to August 2006.

RESULTS

389 hospitals participated in the survey; response rates varied per country. All seven quality improvement strategies were widely used in European countries. Activities related to external assessment were the most broadly applied across Europe, and activities related to patient involvement were the least widely implemented. No one country implemented all quality strategies at all hospitals. There were no differences between participating hospitals in western and eastern European countries regarding the application of quality improvement strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation varied per country and per quality improvement strategy, leaving considerable scope for progress in quality improvements. The results may contribute to benchmarking activities in European countries, and point to further areas of research to explore the relationship between the application of quality improvement strategies and actual hospital performance.

摘要

背景

本研究是评估质量改进策略响应方法(MARQuIS)研究项目的一部分,该项目调查了质量改进策略对欧盟各国医院护理的影响,涉及跨境患者的特定需求。

目的

本文描述了欧盟医院如何应用MARQuIS研究先前定义的七种质量改进策略:组织质量管理计划;获取患者意见的系统;患者安全系统;临床标准的审核和内部评估;临床和实践指南;绩效指标;以及外部评估。

方法

使用基于网络的问卷对八个欧盟国家的急症护理医院进行调查。随后通过对部分参与医院的现场调查和实地访问对报告的结果进行验证。数据收集于2006年4月至8月进行。

结果

389家医院参与了调查;各国的回复率各不相同。所有七种质量改进策略在欧洲国家都被广泛使用。与外部评估相关的活动在欧洲应用最广泛,与患者参与相关的活动实施得最不广泛。没有一个国家在所有医院实施所有质量策略。在质量改进策略的应用方面,西欧和东欧的参与医院之间没有差异。

结论

各国和各质量改进策略的实施情况各不相同,质量改进仍有很大的进步空间。这些结果可能有助于欧洲国家的基准测试活动,并指出进一步的研究领域,以探索质量改进策略的应用与医院实际绩效之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bb/3269892/a7cd2d4abcf2/QHE-18-01-0028-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bb/3269892/a7cd2d4abcf2/QHE-18-01-0028-f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bb/3269892/a7cd2d4abcf2/QHE-18-01-0028-f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of quality improvement strategies in 389 European hospitals: results of the MARQuIS project.质量改进策略在389家欧洲医院中的应用:MARQuIS项目的结果。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i28-37. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029363.
2
Impact of quality strategies on hospital outputs.质量策略对医院产出的影响。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i62-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029439.
3
Investigating organizational quality improvement systems, patient empowerment, organizational culture, professional involvement and the quality of care in European hospitals: the 'Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE)' project.调查欧洲医院的组织质量改进系统、患者赋权、组织文化、专业参与和护理质量:“深化我们对欧洲质量改进的理解(DUQuE)”项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Sep 24;10:281. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-281.
4
Learning from MARQuIS: future direction of quality and safety in hospital care in the European Union.从MARQuIS计划中学习:欧盟医院护理质量与安全的未来方向。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i69-74. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029447.
5
Differentiating between hospitals according to the "maturity" of quality improvement systems: a new classification scheme in a sample of European hospitals.根据质量改进系统的“成熟度”对医院进行区分:欧洲医院样本中的一种新分类方案。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i38-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029389.
6
Implementation of patient safety strategies in European hospitals.欧洲医院患者安全策略的实施。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i57-61. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029413.
7
Cross-border care and healthcare quality improvement in Europe: the MARQuIS research project.欧洲的跨境医疗与医疗质量提升:MARQuIS研究项目
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029678.
8
Do European hospitals have quality and safety governance systems and structures in place?欧洲医院是否具备质量与安全管理体系及架构?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i51-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029306.
9
Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe (DUQuE): overview of a study of hospital quality management in seven countries.深化我们对欧洲质量改进的理解(DUQuE):七个国家医院质量管理研究概述
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Apr;26 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):5-15. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu025. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
National quality improvement policies and strategies in European healthcare systems.欧洲医疗体系中的国家质量改进政策与策略。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i22-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029355.

引用本文的文献

1
Older adults' experiences of being screened for fall risk in a clinical setting: a focus group study.老年人在临床环境中接受跌倒风险筛查的经历:一项焦点小组研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Dec;15(6):1771-1782. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01056-0. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Inpatient Services Provided at an Acute Care Facility: A Quality Improvement Project.急性护理机构住院服务患者满意度评估:一项质量改进项目。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 4;16(3):e55511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55511. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Does public health policy quality foster state innovation capacity? Evidence from a global panel data.

本文引用的文献

1
Do European hospitals have quality and safety governance systems and structures in place?欧洲医院是否具备质量与安全管理体系及架构?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i51-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029306.
2
Cross-border care and healthcare quality improvement in Europe: the MARQuIS research project.欧洲的跨境医疗与医疗质量提升:MARQuIS研究项目
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i3-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029678.
3
National quality improvement policies and strategies in European healthcare systems.
公共卫生政策质量是否能促进国家创新能力?来自全球面板数据的证据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;10:952842. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.952842. eCollection 2022.
4
Contribution of Healthcare Professionals in Issues that Relate to Quality Management.医疗保健专业人员在质量管理相关问题中的贡献。
Mater Sociomed. 2021 Mar;33(1):45-50. doi: 10.5455/msm.2021.33.45-50.
5
Exploring power shifts as an enabler for a strengthened patient role in quality improvements: a Swedish survey study.探索权力转移如何成为增强患者在质量改进中的角色的推动者:一项瑞典调查研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Feb;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001185.
6
The Transition to "Patienthood," the Contribution of the Nursing Assistant: A Grounded Theory Study.向“患者身份”的转变:护理助理的贡献——一项扎根理论研究
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1693-1700. doi: 10.1177/2374373519892414. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
7
Validation of the patient-reported experience measure for care in Chinese hospitals (PREM-CCH).中国医院患者报告的护理体验测量指标(PREM-CCH)的验证
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01370-6.
8
A Parsonian Approach to Patient Safety: Transformational Leadership and Social Capital as Preconditions for Clinical Risk Management-the GI Factor.帕森斯视角下的患者安全:临床风险管理的前提条件——转化型领导与社会资本——GI 因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 4;17(11):3989. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113989.
9
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characteristics that influence the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: implications for infection prevention and control.对影响医院环境中政府主导政策实施的政策干预特征进行的系统评价与综合分析:对感染预防与控制的启示
J Infect Prev. 2020 May;21(3):84-96. doi: 10.1177/1757177420907696. Epub 2020 May 4.
10
Building patient capacity to participate in care during hospitalisation: a scoping review.建立患者在住院期间参与护理的能力:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 3;9(7):e026551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026551.
欧洲医疗体系中的国家质量改进政策与策略。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i22-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029355.
4
Cross border health care in Europe.欧洲的跨境医疗保健。
BMJ. 2008 Jul 3;337(7662):a610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39398.456493.80.
5
How can quality of health care be safeguarded across the European Union?如何在整个欧盟保障医疗保健质量?
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):920-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39538.584190.47.
6
Cross-border health activities in the Euregios: good practice for better health.欧洲区域的跨境卫生活动:促进健康的良好实践。
Health Policy. 2008 May;86(2-3):245-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.10.015. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
7
The term breech presentation: Neonatal results and obstetric practices in France.臀位分娩术语:法国的新生儿结局与产科实践
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Apr 1;125(2):176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.032. Epub 2005 Aug 15.
8
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Feb;27(2):164-88. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30188-8.
9
Failure to rescue: implications for evaluating quality of care during labor and birth.未能成功救治:对评估分娩期间护理质量的影响
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Jan-Mar;19(1):24-34; quiz 35-6. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200501000-00008.
10
What's new and novel in obstetric anesthesia? Contributions from the 2003 scientific literature.产科麻醉领域有哪些新进展和新事物?2003年科学文献的贡献。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005 Apr;14(2):126-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2004.12.007.