Salmanpour R, Handjani F, Nouhpisheh M K
Department of Dermatology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
J Dermatolog Treat. 2001 Sep;12(3):159-62. doi: 10.1080/09546630152607899.
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a vector-borne parasitic disease caused by a range of Leishmania species. Many treatment modalities have been proposed, although pentavalent antimonials are still considered to be the first-line treatment of CL. However, due to the high cost and adverse effects of antimonials, as well as an increase in the number of resistant strains of CL to antimonials, this study was conducted to compare the efficacy of oral ketoconazole with intralesional meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime, Specia, Paris, France) for the treatment of CL. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with CL were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis of CL was confirmed parasitologically using direct skin smears or skin biopsies. The patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Group A (64 patients) was treated with ketoconazole 600 mg/day for adults and 10 mg/kg per day for children for 30 days. Group B (32 patients) was treated with 6-8 biweekly intra-lesional injections of meglumine antimoniate (Glucantime). Both groups were followed for 6 months after termination of treatment. RESULTS: The results showed complete clinical cure in 89% of cases in Group A (treated with oral ketoconazole) and 72% of cases in Group B (treated with intra-lesional Glucantime). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). No significant side effects were observed in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: Oral ketoconazole can be an effective treatment modality in CL, especially in children afflicted with this disease.
背景:皮肤利什曼病(CL)是由多种利什曼原虫引起的一种媒介传播的寄生虫病。虽然五价锑化合物仍被认为是CL的一线治疗药物,但已经提出了许多治疗方法。然而,由于锑化合物的高成本和不良反应,以及CL对锑化合物耐药菌株数量的增加,本研究旨在比较口服酮康唑与病灶内注射葡甲胺锑酸盐(葡醛酯,法国巴黎施佩西亚公司)治疗CL的疗效。 方法:本研究共纳入96例CL患者。通过直接皮肤涂片或皮肤活检进行寄生虫学检查以确诊CL。患者被随机分为两个治疗组。A组(64例患者),成人每天服用酮康唑600mg,儿童每天服用10mg/kg,持续30天。B组(32例患者)每两周进行6 - 8次病灶内注射葡甲胺锑酸盐(葡醛酯)。两组在治疗结束后均随访6个月。 结果:结果显示,A组(口服酮康唑治疗)89%的病例实现了临床完全治愈,B组(病灶内注射葡醛酯治疗)为72%。这种差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两个治疗组均未观察到明显的副作用。 结论:口服酮康唑可以作为CL的一种有效治疗方法,特别是对于患有这种疾病的儿童。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007-4-27
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2019-2-10
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2019-6-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-17
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015-2