Nilforoushzadeh M A, Jaffary F, Ansari N, Siadat A H, Nilforoushan Z, Firouz A
Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Vector Borne Dis. 2008 Dec;45(4):287-91.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Pentavalent antimony compounds are the first line of drugs in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. However, because of their potential toxic effects, many investigations are performed to find an effective and safe treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis patients. Our objective in this investigation was to compare the effect of oral omeprazole and low dose systemic meglumine antimoniate (MA) and standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. In 150 patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis who were randomly divided into three groups and were treated with: (i) MA 60 mg/kg/day/ IM and oral placebo for three weeks; (ii) MA 30 mg/kg/day/IM and oral omeprazole 40 mg/day for three weeks; and (iii) MA 30 mg/kg/day/IM and oral placebo for three weeks. All the patients were visited every two weeks from the beginning of the trial up to six weeks and then at 8 and 12 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatment was classified in three levels as complete response, partial response and no response. Data were analyzed by SPSS 10 using KI square, Mann-Whitney, Kaplan-Mayer and ANOVA tests. RESULTS: Rate of complete response for three months (12 weeks) after starting the treatments was 93% for the group treated with standard dose of glucantime and placebo, 89% for the group treated with omeprazole and low dose glucantime and 80% for the group treated with low dose glucantime and placebo and these differences were significant (p < 0.05). The highest response rate was for the group treated with standard dose of glucantime and placebo. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: Although oral omeprazole and low dose of systemic MA showed less efficacy in comparison to standard dose of systemic MA in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, it still can be considered as a replacement therapy in high risk patients (such as patients with heart, kidney and/or liver disease) under close supervision of physician.
背景与目的:五价锑化合物是治疗皮肤利什曼病的一线药物。然而,由于其潜在的毒性作用,人们开展了许多研究以寻找一种有效且安全的皮肤利什曼病治疗方法。本研究的目的是比较口服奥美拉唑与低剂量系统性葡甲胺锑酸盐(MA)以及标准剂量系统性MA治疗皮肤利什曼病的效果。 方法:这是一项随机双盲临床试验。150例皮肤利什曼病患者被随机分为三组,并接受以下治疗:(i)MA 60 mg/kg/天/肌肉注射,口服安慰剂,为期三周;(ii)MA 30 mg/kg/天/肌肉注射,口服奥美拉唑40 mg/天,为期三周;(iii)MA 30 mg/kg/天/肌肉注射,口服安慰剂,为期三周。从试验开始至六周,每两周对所有患者进行一次访视,然后在第8周和第12周进行访视。治疗效果分为完全缓解、部分缓解和无缓解三个等级。使用SPSS 10软件,通过卡方检验、曼-惠特尼检验、卡普兰-迈耶检验和方差分析对数据进行分析。 结果:开始治疗三个月(12周)后,标准剂量葡甲胺锑酸盐加安慰剂治疗组的完全缓解率为93%,奥美拉唑加低剂量葡甲胺锑酸盐治疗组为89%,低剂量葡甲胺锑酸盐加安慰剂治疗组为80%,这些差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。完全缓解率最高的是标准剂量葡甲胺锑酸盐加安慰剂治疗组。 解读与结论:尽管在治疗皮肤利什曼病方面,口服奥美拉唑和低剂量系统性MA相较于标准剂量系统性MA疗效较差,但在医生密切监督下,它仍可被视为高危患者(如患有心脏疾病、肾脏疾病和/或肝脏疾病的患者)的替代疗法。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007-4-27
N Engl J Med. 1992-3-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-17
Clin Drug Investig. 2017-7
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014-5-1
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2011-11-18