Kuldau J M, Dirks S J
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977 Nov;34(11):1331-40. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1977.01770230073004.
The effect of a treatment program (E) providing inpatient care, a day hospital, community housing, and sheltered work are compared with a program (C) emphasizing rapid discharge. A group of 94 male general psychiatric patients were randomized to the two units. Outcome data collected at 18 months from admission revealed small but significant differences between the total samples in employment, maintenance of treatment contact, use of medication, and social adjustment. More C than E patients were in the hospital after the 14th month. Program effects varied considerably with patient type. Patients with less social disability had somewhat better employment outcomes with the E program, but no differences in use of services. Patients with a better prognosis by measure of psychopathology (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory cluster and diagnosis of schizophrenia) spent less inpatient time in the E program, but were not helped to better employment outcomes. Patients with greater social handicap were not differentially affected. More E patients than C with a poorer prognosis stayed in outpatient treatment and used antipsychotic medications. Patients in the E group with better previous employment and more social isolation used the E day hospital and community housing more heavily than other E subgroups.
将提供住院护理、日间医院、社区住房和庇护性工作的治疗方案(E)与强调快速出院的方案(C)进行比较。一组94名男性普通精神病患者被随机分配到这两个治疗组。从入院起18个月收集的结果数据显示,在就业、维持治疗接触、药物使用和社会适应方面,总样本之间存在微小但显著的差异。第14个月后,在医院的C组患者比E组患者更多。方案效果因患者类型而异。社会残疾程度较轻的患者在E方案下就业结果略好,但在服务使用方面没有差异。通过精神病理学指标(明尼苏达多相人格调查表聚类和精神分裂症诊断)预后较好的患者在E方案下住院时间较短,但在就业结果方面没有得到改善。社会障碍较大的患者没有受到不同影响。预后较差的患者中,留在门诊治疗并使用抗精神病药物的E组患者比C组患者更多。与其他E亚组相比,以前就业较好且社会隔离程度较高的E组患者更频繁地使用E日间医院和社区住房。