Guedes Roberto M C, Gebhart Connie J, Winkelman Nathan L, Mackie-Nuss Rebecca A
Department of Veterinary PathoBiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul 55108, USA.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2002 Sep;14(5):420-3. doi: 10.1177/104063870201400512.
The currently used indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) for the detection of antibodies against porcine proliferative enteropathy (PPE) was compared to an immunoperoxidase monolayer assay (IPMA). Serum samples used in this comparison were collected from 5-week-old pigs on day 0 (pre-experimental challenge) and on days 7, 14, 21, and 28 after oral inoculation with intestinal homogenate from pigs affected by PPE (28 challenged pigs) and sucrose phosphate glutamate solution (2 control pigs). All animals were euthanized 4 weeks after inoculation. Immunohistochemistry staining was applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of ileum for the detection of Lawsonia intracellularis antigen. The serology results with each method agreed in all samples, except on days 0 and 7 in 1 control animal, which was positive by IPMA, but negative by IFAT. The percentage of agreement between IFAT and IPMA was 98.6%.
将目前用于检测抗猪增生性肠炎(PPE)抗体的间接荧光抗体试验(IFAT)与免疫过氧化物酶单层试验(IPMA)进行了比较。用于此次比较的血清样本采自5周龄仔猪,在第0天(实验性攻毒前)以及口服接种受PPE影响的猪的肠匀浆(28头攻毒猪)和蔗糖磷酸谷氨酸溶液(2头对照猪)后的第7、14、21和28天。接种4周后对所有动物实施安乐死。对福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的回肠切片进行免疫组织化学染色,以检测细胞内劳森菌抗原。除1头对照动物在第0天和第7天出现不同结果外,两种方法的血清学检测结果在所有样本中均一致,该对照动物经IPMA检测为阳性,但经IFAT检测为阴性。IFAT与IPMA之间的一致性百分比为98.6%。