Makhoul Imad R, Smolkin Tatiana, Sujov Polo
Department of Neonatology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
ASAIO J. 2002 Sep-Oct;48(5):476-9. doi: 10.1097/00002480-200209000-00006.
The nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) ElectroMedical Equipment (EME) system has recently gained wide use in premature infants. However, occasional impingement of the expiratory tubing exit by mattress, coverings, or walls of infant warmers is of concern because of risk for obstruction and pneumothorax. The purpose of this study was to verify whether the use of NCPAP, namely Aladdin-1 (EME, Brighton, England), increases the risk for pneumothorax. The study included premature infants with respiratory distress who necessitated one or more of the following modes: oxygen via head box, NCPAP, synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), or high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). For every patient, we recorded the modes of respiratory support, duration of use, and the occurrence of pneumothorax during every mode (number of pneumothorax cases/100 days of support). Among 163 sick premature neonates, pneumothorax developed in 0.17, 1.77, 0.3, and 6 cases per 100 days of oxygen via head box, NCPAP, SIMV, and HFOV, respectively. Pneumothorax developed more often during NCPAP than with SIMV. Pneumothorax in premature infants might be increased with the use of the newly developed NCPAP system. In these circumstances, possible accidental obstruction of the exit of its expiratory tubing could be contributory to this complication.
鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)电子医疗设备(EME)系统最近在早产儿中得到广泛应用。然而,由于存在阻塞和气胸风险,婴儿床垫、覆盖物或暖箱壁偶尔会压迫呼气管道出口,这令人担忧。本研究的目的是验证使用NCPAP(即阿拉丁-1,英国布莱顿EME公司生产)是否会增加气胸风险。该研究纳入了有呼吸窘迫的早产儿,这些早产儿需要以下一种或多种模式:通过头罩吸氧、NCPAP、同步间歇指令通气(SIMV)或高频振荡通气(HFOV)。对于每位患者,我们记录了呼吸支持模式、使用持续时间以及每种模式下气胸的发生情况(气胸病例数/100天支持时间)。在163例患病早产儿中,通过头罩吸氧、NCPAP、SIMV和HFOV时,每100天发生气胸的病例数分别为0.17、1.77、0.3和6例。NCPAP期间气胸的发生率高于SIMV。使用新开发的NCPAP系统可能会增加早产儿气胸的发生率。在这种情况下,呼气管道出口可能意外阻塞可能是导致这一并发症的原因。