Suppr超能文献

研究用户观点时的伦理考量。

Ethical considerations in researching user views.

作者信息

Seymour J, Skilbeck J

机构信息

Sheffield Palliative Care Studies Group, The University of Sheffield and Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002 Sep;11(3):215-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00342.x.

Abstract

Researching user views has become a central plank of UK cancer and palliative care policy, not least because it is recognized that current systems for treatment reflect inadequately the experiences and concerns of cancer patients. This paper examines the process of accessing user views about cancer and palliative care from an ethical perspective, drawing by way of example on a study of outcomes associated with Macmillan nursing. A moral theory framework is used to discuss some of the issues involved in trying to achieve ethically sound practice and some essentially political issues that frame the process of accessing users' views are highlighted. The paper recommends that models of research be developed for accessing user views that are congruent with the values and philosophies of supportive and palliative care. This requires striking a fine balance between the ethical duties of providing care and support, nurturing independence and autonomy, and achieving research outcomes that are rigorous while also being accessible and meaningful to users. It also requires developing an understanding of the social, political and economic context of research enquiry with users.

摘要

研究用户观点已成为英国癌症与姑息治疗政策的核心内容,这尤其是因为人们认识到,当前的治疗体系未能充分反映癌症患者的经历和关切。本文从伦理角度审视获取癌症与姑息治疗用户观点的过程,以一项关于麦克米伦护理相关结果的研究为例进行阐述。运用一种道德理论框架来讨论在努力实现符合伦理规范的实践中所涉及的一些问题,并突出了构成获取用户观点过程的一些基本政治问题。本文建议开发适用于获取用户观点的研究模式,使其与支持性和姑息治疗的价值观及理念相一致。这需要在提供护理与支持的伦理责任、培养独立性和自主性以及取得严谨且对用户而言易懂且有意义的研究成果之间达成微妙平衡。这还需要深入了解与用户进行研究调查的社会、政治和经济背景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验