• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study.研究“善终”的关键挑战与未来方向:定性深入访谈和焦点小组研究
BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
2
The 'dis-ease' of dying: challenges in nursing care of the dying in the acute hospital setting. A qualitative observational study.濒死之“不适”:急症医院环境中临终护理的挑战。一项定性观察研究。
Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;27(8):757-64. doi: 10.1177/0269216313477176. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
3
Researching experiences of terminal cancer: a systematic review of methodological issues and approaches.晚期癌症患者的研究经历:方法学问题与方法的系统综述
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Jul;17(4):377-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00880.x.
4
Interviews on end-of-life care with older people: reflections on six european studies.临终关怀访谈:对六项欧洲研究的反思。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Nov;21(11):1588-600. doi: 10.1177/1049732311415286. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
5
Overcoming barriers to recruitment in care of the dying research in hospitals.克服临终关怀研究在医院招募中的障碍。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 May;45(5):859-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
6
Maintaining integrity in the face of death: a grounded theory to explain the perspectives of people affected by lung cancer about the expression of wishes for end of life care.面对死亡时保持完整:一个扎根理论,用以解释肺癌患者对生命终末期护理意愿表达的观点。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jun;49(6):718-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
7
End-of-life care research with bereaved informal caregivers--analysis of recruitment strategy and participation rate from a multi-centre validation study.对丧亲的非正式照料者进行的临终关怀研究——来自一项多中心验证性研究的招募策略与参与率分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 May 2;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0020-4.
8
Palliative and end-of-life care in prisons: a content analysis of the literature.监狱中的姑息治疗与临终关怀:文献内容分析
Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):172-97. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2013-0024.
9
Diagnosis, prognosis and awareness of dying in nursing homes: towards the Gold Standard?养老院中的诊断、预后和临终意识:迈向金标准?
Int J Older People Nurs. 2014 Jun;9(2):95-105. doi: 10.1111/opn.12024. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
10
Bereaved carers' accounts of the end of life and the role of care providers in a 'good death': A qualitative study.丧亲护理者对临终情况的描述以及护理提供者在“善终”中的作用:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;29(9):834-41. doi: 10.1177/0269216315584865. Epub 2015 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The mismatch in hierarchical diagnosis and treatment construction and related reasons: a qualitative analysis from ZX City, Hubei Province.分级诊疗建设中的不匹配及其相关原因:来自湖北省ZX市的定性分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 21;13:1524732. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1524732. eCollection 2025.
2
"Being empathetic, being accommodating, not only to the person you're talking to, but also to yourself"- a qualitative study on preparing and conducting interviews with palliative care patients.“富有同理心、善于包容,不仅要包容与你交谈的人,也要包容自己”——一项关于对姑息治疗患者进行访谈的准备与实施的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 7;24(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01769-4.
3
Ethnographic closeness: methodological reflections on the interplay of engagement and detachment in immersive ethnographic research.民族志亲密性:关于沉浸式民族志研究中参与与超脱相互作用的方法论思考
J R Anthropol Inst. 2023 Dec;29(4):820-839. doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.14007. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Recruitment of participants with pancreatic cancer to a mixed media study for optimal recruitment in an Australasian survey of pancreatic enzyme replacement.招募胰腺癌患者参加混合媒体研究,以优化在澳大拉西亚胰腺酶替代治疗调查中的招募效果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 30;13(11):e076242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076242.
5
Top 10 Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Messaging for the Public.十大要点:临终关怀临床医生应该了解的公共信息传递技巧。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Mar;27(3):405-410. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0533. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
Using Normalization Process Theory to Evaluate an End-of-Life Pediatric Palliative Care Web-Based Training Program for Nurses: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.运用标准化流程理论评估面向护士的临终儿科姑息治疗在线培训项目:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):e23783. doi: 10.2196/23783.
7
Understanding patient views and experiences of the IDENTIfication of PALLiative care needs (IDENTI-Pall): a qualitative interview study protocol.理解患者对识别姑息治疗需求的观点和体验(IDENTI-Pall):一项定性访谈研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e062500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062500.
8
A good death in the child with life shortening illness: A qualitative multiple-case study.缩短生命的儿童的善终:一项定性多案例研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1878-1888. doi: 10.1177/02692163211027700. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
9
Palliative care for people with substance use disorder and multiple problems: a qualitative study on experiences of patients and proxies.患有物质使用障碍和多种问题的人的姑息治疗:患者和代理人的经验的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 12;18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0443-4.
10
The journey through care: study protocol for a longitudinal qualitative interview study to investigate the healthcare experiences and preferences of children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families in the West Midlands, UK.关爱之旅:一项纵向定性访谈研究的研究方案,旨在调查英国西米德兰兹郡患有危及生命和有生命危险疾病的儿童、青少年及其家庭的医疗保健经历和偏好。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e018266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018266.

本文引用的文献

1
Research into care at the end of life.
Lancet. 2005;365(9461):735-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)18000-3.
2
Patient centred death.以患者为中心的死亡。
BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):174-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.174.
3
Researching experiences of cancer: the importance of methodology.癌症研究经历:方法学的重要性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002 Sep;11(3):232-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00344.x.
4
Research sensitivities to palliative care patients.研究姑息治疗患者的敏感性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002 Sep;11(3):220-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00343.x.
5
Ethical considerations in researching user views.研究用户观点时的伦理考量。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2002 Sep;11(3):215-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.2002.00342.x.
6
Recruiting into palliative care trials: lessons learnt from a feasibility study.招募患者参与姑息治疗试验:可行性研究的经验教训。
Palliat Med. 2002 Mar;16(2):163-5. doi: 10.1191/0269216302pm551xx.
7
Gaining and maintaining consent: ethical concerns raised in a study of dying patients.获取并维持同意:一项针对濒死患者的研究中引发的伦理问题。
Qual Health Res. 2001 Sep;11(5):693-705. doi: 10.1177/104973201129119389.
8
The use of research-based theatre in a project related to metastatic breast cancer.基于研究的戏剧在一个与转移性乳腺癌相关的项目中的应用。
Health Expect. 2000 Jun;3(2):137-144. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00071.x.
9
Users' views on palliative care services: ethical implications.用户对姑息治疗服务的看法:伦理影响
Nurs Ethics. 2000 Jul;7(4):314-26. doi: 10.1177/096973300000700405.
10
Perceptions of health care need in lung cancer. Can prospective surveys provide nationally representative data?肺癌患者对医疗需求的认知。前瞻性调查能否提供具有全国代表性的数据?
Palliat Med. 2000 Sep;14(5):410-8. doi: 10.1191/026921600701536246.

研究“善终”的关键挑战与未来方向:定性深入访谈和焦点小组研究

Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study.

作者信息

Kendall Marilyn, Harris Fiona, Boyd Kirsty, Sheikh Aziz, Murray Scott A, Brown Duncan, Mallinson Ian, Kearney Nora, Worth Allison

机构信息

Primary Palliative Care Research Group, Division of Community Health Sciences: General Practice Section, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9DX.

出版信息

BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):521. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55. Epub 2007 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.39097.582639.55
PMID:17329313
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1819552/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand key challenges in researching end of life issues and identify ways of overcoming these.

DESIGN

Qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with researchers and focus groups with people affected by cancer.

PARTICIPANTS

An international sample of 32 researchers; seven patients with experience of cancer; and four carers in south east Scotland.

RESULTS

Researchers highlighted the difficulty of defining the end of life, overprotective gatekeeping by ethics committees and clinical staff, the need to factor in high attrition rates associated with deterioration or death, and managing the emotions of participants and research staff. People affected by cancer and researchers suggested that many people nearing the end of life do want to be offered the chance to participate in research, provided it is conducted sensitively. Although such research can be demanding, most researchers believed it to be no more problematic than many other areas of research and that the challenges identified can be overcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuing taboos around death and dying act as barriers to the commissioning and conduct of end of life research. Some people facing death, however, may want to participate in research and should be allowed to do so. Ethics committees and clinical staff must balance understandable concern about non-maleficence with the right of people with advanced illness to participate in research. Despite the inherent difficulties, end of life research can be conducted with ethical and methodological rigour. Adequate psychological support must be provided for participants, researchers, and transcribers.

摘要

目的

了解在研究临终问题时面临的关键挑战,并确定克服这些挑战的方法。

设计

定性研究,包括对研究人员进行深入访谈以及与癌症患者进行焦点小组讨论。

参与者

来自国际的32名研究人员样本;7名有癌症经历的患者;以及苏格兰东南部的4名护理人员。

结果

研究人员强调了定义临终的困难、伦理委员会和临床工作人员过度保护性的把关、需要考虑与病情恶化或死亡相关的高损耗率,以及管理参与者和研究人员的情绪。受癌症影响的人和研究人员表示,许多临终患者确实希望有机会参与研究,前提是研究的开展方式得当。尽管此类研究要求很高,但大多数研究人员认为它并不比许多其他研究领域更具问题,而且所确定的挑战是可以克服的。

结论

围绕死亡和临终的持续禁忌成为开展临终研究的障碍。然而,一些面临死亡的人可能希望参与研究,应该允许他们这样做。伦理委员会和临床工作人员必须在对不伤害原则的合理关注与晚期疾病患者参与研究的权利之间取得平衡。尽管存在固有困难,但临终研究仍可在伦理和方法上严格进行。必须为参与者、研究人员和转录人员提供充分的心理支持。