Cleveland A P
Am J Law Med. 1975 Mar;1(1):55-69.
This Article presents a summary analysis of the administrative and statutory bases for the documented, prevalent mismanagement of Suddern Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) cases by a majority of local death investigation agencies in the United States. Herein, Alan P. Cleveland, J.D. advances the theory that the unsatisfactory handling of cases of SIDS by the medicolegal community is the inevitable outgrowth of state laws that expressly require investigative agencies to approach a sudden, unexplained death from the direction of determining first whether or not a criminal act has occurred. In so doing, most statutorily mandated autopsy procedures are socially counterproductive since, in ignoring an acute medical need for supportive family counselling, they often constitute an insuperable obstacle to the effective management of SIDS as a public health problem. The author recommends that a requisite first step in implementing an SIDS management program at the state level is to insulate surviving family members form criminal investigative procedures by appropriate amendment of state laws governing local death investigation systems.
本文对美国大多数地方死亡调查机构记录在案的、普遍存在的婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)病例管理不善的行政和法律依据进行了总结分析。在此,法学博士艾伦·P·克利夫兰提出了一种理论,即法医学界对SIDS病例处理不当是州法律的必然结果,这些州法律明确要求调查机构从首先确定是否发生了犯罪行为的方向来处理突然发生的、原因不明的死亡事件。这样做的话,大多数法定的尸检程序在社会上会适得其反,因为它们忽视了对支持性家庭咨询的迫切医疗需求,往往成为将SIDS作为公共卫生问题进行有效管理的不可逾越的障碍。作者建议,在州一级实施SIDS管理计划的必要第一步是通过适当修订管理地方死亡调查系统的州法律,使幸存的家庭成员免受刑事调查程序的影响。