A comparison between anterior and posterior monitoring of neuromuscular blockade at the diaphragm: both sites can be used interchangeably.

UNLABELLED

We present a novel site of monitoring neuromuscular blockade of the diaphragm at the patient's back. After the induction of anesthesia, 12 patients were orotracheally intubated. Two Ag/AgCl-electrodes were attached at the right seventh or eighth intercostal space between the midclavicular and anterior axillary line; two Ag/AgCl-electrodes were paravertebrally attached on the right side lateral to vertebrae T12-L1 or L1-2. Two Ag/AgCl-skin-electrodes were placed over the right thenar area for an electromyography recording of the adductor pollicis (AP) muscle, and two Ag/AgCl-skin-electrodes were used to stimulate the ulnar nerve. Onset and offset of neuromuscular blockade after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were determined, and significant differences between diaphragm and AP muscle and agreement between the two methods were determined. Mean maximum block was more than 96% at all sites. Lag time, onset 50, and onset time were not significantly different between the diaphragm and the AP. However, time to reach 25% of control twitch was significantly longer at the AP muscle than at the diaphragm (P < 0.001). The difference of the means and limits of agreement between the anterior and the posterior site of diaphragmatic monitoring were 0 +/- 11 s, 3 +/- 9 s, 0 +/- 19 s, and -2% +/- 5% for lag, onset 50, onset time, and peak effect, respectively, and -2 +/- 2 min for the time to reach 25% of control twitch of neuromuscular blockade. We conclude that anterior and posterior diaphragmatic monitoring can be used interchangeably to determine neuromuscular blockade after rocuronium.

IMPLICATIONS

We present a novel site of monitoring neuromuscular blockade of the diaphragm at the patient's back, which shows good agreement with the conventional anterior site at the seventh or eighth intercostal space.