Martin Joseph B, Reynolds Thomas P
Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Room 111, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Jul;8(3):443-54. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0066-6.
Over the past 50 years, academic-industrial collaborations and technology transfer have played an increasingly prominent role in the biomedical sciences. These relationships can speed the delivery of innovative drugs and medical technologies to clinical practice, creating important public health benefits as well as income for universities and their faculty. At the same time, they raise ethical concerns, particularly when research involves human subjects in clinical trials. Lapses in oversight of industry sponsored clinical trials at universities, and especially patient deaths in a number of trials, have brought these issues into the public spotlight and have led the federal government to intensify its oversight of clinical research. The leadership of Harvard Medical School convened a group of leaders in academic medicine to formulate guidelines on individual financial conflicts of interest. They and other groups are working to formulate a national consensus on this issue.
在过去50年里,学术-产业合作与技术转让在生物医学领域发挥着越来越重要的作用。这些合作关系能够加速创新药物和医疗技术应用于临床实践,为公众健康带来重要益处,同时也为大学及其教职员工创造收入。与此同时,它们引发了伦理方面的担忧,尤其是当研究涉及临床试验中的人类受试者时。大学对行业资助的临床试验监督不力,特别是一些试验中出现患者死亡的情况,已将这些问题置于公众关注的焦点,并促使联邦政府加强对临床研究的监管。哈佛医学院的领导层召集了一批学术医学领域的领导者,以制定关于个人财务利益冲突的指导方针。他们和其他团体正在努力就这一问题达成全国共识。