Fehr Beverley
University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):265-84. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.265.
A prototype interaction-pattern model of intimacy expectations was proposed. The central tenet of this model was that people develop knowledge of the patterns of relating that are likely to produce intimacy in a same-sex friendship. Further, it was posited that these interaction patterns are structured as prototypes, such that some patterns of relating are regarded as more likely to create a sense of intimacy than others. Support for this model was found in 6 studies. Interaction patterns depicting self-disclosure, emotional support, and the like were considered more prototypical of intimacy expectations than patterns depicting shared activities and practical support. Regarding gender, women rated intimacy interaction patterns higher than did men, particularly prototypical patterns. However, women and men agreed that prototypical interaction patterns were more indicative of intimacy in a friendship than nonprototypical patterns. Implications for the controversy over whether women's friendships are more intimate than men's are discussed.
提出了一个亲密期望的原型互动模式模型。该模型的核心原则是,人们会形成关于在同性友谊中可能产生亲密感的关系模式的认知。此外,假定这些互动模式是以原型的形式构建的,以至于某些关系模式被认为比其他模式更有可能营造出亲密感。在6项研究中发现了对该模型的支持。与描述共同活动和实际支持的模式相比,描述自我表露、情感支持等的互动模式被认为更能代表亲密期望的原型。在性别方面,女性对亲密互动模式的评分高于男性,尤其是原型模式。然而,女性和男性都认为,原型互动模式比非原型模式更能表明友谊中的亲密感。文中还讨论了有关女性友谊是否比男性友谊更亲密这一争议的相关影响。