Suppr超能文献

非神经外科医师放置颅内压监测器:可取得良好效果。

Placement of intracranial pressure monitors by non-neurosurgeons: excellent outcomes can be achieved.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas 67214, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):558-63; discussion 563-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318265cb75.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury remains one of the most prevalent and costly injuries encountered within the discipline of trauma and represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality within our society. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor placement by general surgery residents and neurosurgeons.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all trauma patients requiring ICP monitor placement at an American College of Surgeons-verified Level 1 trauma center during a 10-year period was performed. Comparison of demographic variables, injury severity, intracranial injuries, incidence of ICP monitor-related complications, and outcomes were made between general surgery residents, trauma surgeons, and neurosurgeons.

RESULTS

There were 546 patients included in the study. The average age of the cohort was 37.6 years, with an average hospital length of stay being 16.0 days and an Injury Severity Score of 27.7. Mechanisms of injury varied, but 58.8% was a result of motor vehicle and motorcycle collisions, and an additional 19.2% was a result of falls. No significant difference was found in terms of procedure-related complications between subgroups, including intracranial hemorrhage, infection, malfunctions, dislodgment, or death.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that the placement of ICP monitors may be performed safely by both neurosurgeons and non-neurosurgeons. This procedure should thus be considered a core skill for trauma surgeons and surgical residents alike, thereby allowing initiation of prompt medical treatment in both rural areas and trauma centers with inadequate neurosurgeon or fellow coverage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

摘要

背景

颅脑损伤仍然是创伤学科中最常见和代价最高的损伤之一,也是导致我国发病率和死亡率居高不下的主要原因。本研究旨在比较普通外科住院医师和神经外科医生放置颅内压(ICP)监测器的安全性。

方法

对一家美国外科医师学院认证的一级创伤中心在 10 年间所有需要 ICP 监测器放置的创伤患者进行回顾性图表审查。比较普通外科住院医师、创伤外科医生和神经外科医生之间的人口统计学变量、损伤严重程度、颅内损伤、ICP 监测器相关并发症发生率和结局。

结果

研究纳入了 546 名患者。该队列的平均年龄为 37.6 岁,平均住院时间为 16.0 天,损伤严重程度评分为 27.7。损伤机制各异,但 58.8%是由于机动车和摩托车碰撞造成的,另有 19.2%是由于跌倒造成的。亚组之间在与手术相关的并发症方面没有发现显著差异,包括颅内出血、感染、故障、移位或死亡。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,神经外科医生和非神经外科医生都可以安全地放置 ICP 监测器。因此,该手术应被视为创伤外科医生和外科住院医师的核心技能,从而允许在农村地区和神经外科医生或同事覆盖不足的创伤中心及时开始医疗治疗。

证据水平

治疗研究,IV 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验