Hoozemans M J M, van der Beek A J, Frings-Dresen M H W, van der Woude L H V, van Dijk F J H
Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, AmCOGG Amsterdam Centre for Research into Health and Health Care, Academic Medical Centre/University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, Netherlands.
Occup Environ Med. 2002 Oct;59(10):696-702. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.10.696.
To examine the association between exposure to pushing/pulling at work and low back and shoulder complaints.
A cross sectional questionnaire survey was carried out among 434 workers from several companies with mainly pushing/pulling tasks. From the same companies 188 workers without physically demanding tasks served as reference. The questionnaire was used to assess the exposure to pushing/pulling and other physical risk factors for low back and shoulder complaints. Mean scores at company level were used to classify groups into medium and high exposed to pushing/pulling and a reference group. Psychosocial factors at work were also assessed. Several pain related questionnaires were used to assess the 12 month prevalence of low back and shoulder complaints in three dimensions: trouble (ache, pain, discomfort), pain intensity, and disability. Prevalence rate ratios (PRs) were calculated using Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis.
The 12 month prevalence of low back complaints was almost equal for all three groups. The prevalence of shoulder complaints increased with an increase in exposure level. Adjusted PRs showed that the high exposed group had an increased risk for low back complaints compared to the reference group. For all dimensions of shoulder complaints a clear tendency towards a dose-response relation was observed. The high exposed group had significant PRs for shoulder complaints, ranging from 2.09 to 6.37. Generally, psychosocial factors had a confounding effect for pain intensity and disability, but not for trouble.
For shoulder complaints a dose-response relation was observed for exposure to pushing/pulling. Low back complaints were less consistently associated with pushing/pulling. Stronger associations were observed for more severe cases of low back and shoulder complaints. It is hypothesised that work related psychosocial factors affect these associations.
研究工作中推拉作业暴露与腰背部及肩部不适之间的关联。
对几家主要从事推拉作业的公司的434名工人进行了横断面问卷调查。从同一些公司选取188名无体力要求作业的工人作为对照。问卷用于评估推拉作业暴露以及腰背部和肩部不适的其他身体风险因素。公司层面的平均得分用于将各组分为推拉作业暴露程度中等和高暴露组以及一个对照组。还评估了工作中的社会心理因素。使用几份与疼痛相关的问卷从三个维度评估腰背部和肩部不适的12个月患病率:问题(疼痛、酸痛、不适)、疼痛强度和功能障碍。患病率比(PRs)采用Cox比例风险回归分析计算。
三组的腰背部不适12个月患病率几乎相等。肩部不适的患病率随暴露水平的增加而增加。调整后的PRs显示,与对照组相比,高暴露组腰背部不适的风险增加。对于肩部不适的所有维度,均观察到明显的剂量反应关系趋势。高暴露组肩部不适的PRs显著,范围为2.09至6.37。一般来说,社会心理因素对疼痛强度和功能障碍有混杂效应,但对问题无此效应。
对于肩部不适,观察到推拉作业暴露存在剂量反应关系。腰背部不适与推拉作业的关联不太一致。对于更严重的腰背部和肩部不适病例,观察到更强的关联。据推测,与工作相关的社会心理因素会影响这些关联。