• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交通安全与转向主要安全带法:加利福尼亚的经验。

Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law: the California experience.

作者信息

Houston David J, Richardson Lilliard E

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 37996-0410, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2002 Nov;34(6):743-51. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00074-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00074-4
PMID:12371779
Abstract

This study explores whether the change of an existing seat belt law from secondary to primary enforcement enhances traffic safety. In particular, we examine traffic fatalities and injuries in California from 1988 to 1997. During the first half of this period, California law provided for secondary enforcement of its mandatory seat belt law, but in 1993 it upgraded the law to primary enforcement. Controlling for the number of motor vehicle collisions, a Box-Tiao intervention analysis of the time series is used to compare the monthly fatalities and injuries before and after the change in the enforcement provision. The results show that California experienced an improvement in traffic safety in terms of a significant reduction in injuries, but the change in enforcement provision had no statistically significant impact on fatalities.

摘要

本研究探讨将现有安全带法律从二级执法改为一级执法是否能提高交通安全。具体而言,我们研究了1988年至1997年加利福尼亚州的交通死亡和受伤情况。在此期间的前半段,加利福尼亚州法律规定对其强制性安全带法律进行二级执法,但在1993年将该法律升级为一级执法。在控制机动车碰撞数量的情况下,使用时间序列的Box-Tiao干预分析来比较执法规定变更前后的月度死亡和受伤情况。结果表明,加利福尼亚州在交通安全方面有所改善,受伤人数大幅减少,但执法规定的变更对死亡人数没有统计学上的显著影响。

相似文献

1
Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law: the California experience.交通安全与转向主要安全带法:加利福尼亚的经验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2002 Nov;34(6):743-51. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00074-4.
2
Using Enforcement and Adjudication Data to Assess the Impact of a Primary Safety Belt Law.利用执法与裁决数据评估主要安全带法的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(7):664-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.999857.
3
Cross-sectional study of road accidents and related law enforcement efficiency for 10 countries: A gap coherence analysis.10个国家道路交通事故及相关执法效率的横断面研究:差距一致性分析
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):686-91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1146823. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
Evidence-based policy on road safety: the effect of the demerit points system on seat belt use and health outcomes.基于证据的道路安全政策:扣分制度对安全带使用及健康结果的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Oct;61(10):877-81. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.057729.
5
Seat belt use in States and territories with primary and secondary laws--United States, 2006.州和地区实施主次立法管理安全带使用情况——美国,2006 年。
J Safety Res. 2009;40(6):469-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
6
The effects of Maine's change to primary seat belt law on seat belt use and public perception and awareness.缅因州对基本安全带法的修改对安全带使用及公众认知和意识的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;11(2):165-72. doi: 10.1080/15389580903524791.
7
Use of seat belt and enforcement of seat belt laws in Pakistan.巴基斯坦安全带的使用和安全带法律的执行。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):706-10. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.877586.
8
Safety belt use and the switch to primary enforcement, 1991-2003.1991 - 2003年安全带使用情况及向主要执法方式的转变
Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1949-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.074385. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
9
Seat belt and mobile phone use among vehicle drivers in the city of Doha, Qatar: an observational study.卡塔尔多哈市车辆驾驶员使用安全带和手机情况的观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 22;15:937. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2283-3.
10
Impact of primary safety belt laws on alcohol-related front-seat occupant fatalities: five case studies.主要安全带法律对与酒精相关的前排乘客死亡的影响:五个案例研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2007 Sep;8(3):232-43. doi: 10.1080/15389580701218489.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
A Time Series Model for Assessing the Trend and Forecasting the Road Traffic Accident Mortality.一种用于评估道路交通事故死亡率趋势和预测的时间序列模型。
Arch Trauma Res. 2016 Aug 3;5(3):e36570. doi: 10.5812/atr.36570. eCollection 2016 Sep.
3
Seat Belt Usage in Injured Car Occupants: Injury Patterns, Severity and Outcome After Two Main Car Accident Mechanisms in Kashan, Iran, 2012.
2012年伊朗卡尚地区主要两种汽车事故机制下受伤车内驾乘人员的安全带使用情况:损伤模式、严重程度及后果
Arch Trauma Res. 2015 Jan 12;4(1):e22203. doi: 10.5812/atr.22203. eCollection 2015 Mar.
4
Occupant and crash characteristics in thoracic and lumbar spine injuries resulting from motor vehicle collisions.机动车碰撞导致胸腰椎损伤中的驾乘人员与碰撞特征
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.038. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
5
Safety belt laws and disparities in safety belt use among US high-school drivers.美国高中生司机使用安全带的法律和差异。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):1128-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300493. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
6
The effect of state regulations on truck-crash fatalities.州法规对卡车碰撞致死事故的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):408-15. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.136952. Epub 2009 Jan 15.