• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用执法与裁决数据评估主要安全带法的影响。

Using Enforcement and Adjudication Data to Assess the Impact of a Primary Safety Belt Law.

作者信息

Costich Julia F, Slavova Svetla S

机构信息

a Department of Health Management & Policy , University of Kentucky , Lexington , Kentucky.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(7):664-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.999857.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2014.999857
PMID:25569430
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of effective implementation strategies for motor vehicle injury prevention law is an important priority for research in public health law and policy. Extensive literature in related fields demonstrates the relationship between enforcement activities and achievement of safety objectives.

PURPOSE

We conducted this study to determine the role of enforcement and adjudication in the implementation of a primary safety belt law, including the level and sustainability of safety belt-related conviction rates, using newly available data from the state judicial administrative authority. A secondary goal was to assess the contribution of the administrative data set to the analysis of the primary safety belt law.

METHODS

The analysis used an interrupted time series design to evaluate the longitudinal effect of the primary safety belt law implementation in 2007 on safety belt infractions and convictions in Kentucky, 2003-2012. Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate changes in the level and trend of safety belt nonuse conviction rate after the full implementation of the law, while controlling for the baseline level and trend. The association between the safety belt-related conviction rates and other expected outcomes of the law's implementation was studied.

RESULTS

Safety belt citations doubled and convictions nearly tripled during the decade studied, most dramatically in the first year. Increases were sustained throughout the study period. There was a strong positive linear association between the safety belt nonuse conviction rate and the observed safety belt use in the state, as well as a strong negative association between the safety belt nonuse conviction rate and the number of nonrestrained motor vehicle crash fatalities.

DISCUSSION

Our analysis demonstrates that Kentucky's public safety and judicial systems took the new law seriously and enforced it effectively and that the increased level of enforcement persisted for at least 5 years after implementation. We also find that data from judicial system administrative agency reports make an important contribution to public policy analysis. In the face of persistent antiregulatory forces and public-sector budget cuts, it is critically important to document the relationship between enforcement activities and the achievement of legislative goals.

摘要

背景

确定机动车伤害预防法律的有效实施策略是公共卫生法律与政策研究的一项重要优先任务。相关领域的大量文献表明了执法活动与安全目标实现之间的关系。

目的

我们开展本研究,以利用州司法行政部门新获取的数据,确定执法与裁决在一项主要安全带法律实施过程中的作用,包括与安全带相关的定罪率水平及可持续性。第二个目标是评估行政数据集对主要安全带法律分析的贡献。

方法

该分析采用中断时间序列设计,以评估2007年主要安全带法律实施对2003 - 2012年肯塔基州安全带违规及定罪情况的纵向影响。使用分段回归分析来估计法律全面实施后安全带未使用定罪率的水平和趋势变化,同时控制基线水平和趋势。研究了与安全带相关的定罪率与该法律实施的其他预期结果之间的关联。

结果

在所研究的十年间,安全带罚单数量翻倍,定罪数量几乎增至三倍,最显著的是在第一年。在整个研究期间增长持续。该州安全带未使用定罪率与观察到的安全带使用情况之间存在强烈的正线性关联,安全带未使用定罪率与未系安全带的机动车碰撞死亡人数之间存在强烈的负关联。

讨论

我们的分析表明,肯塔基州的公共安全和司法系统认真对待新法律并有效执行,且执法力度的增强在实施后至少持续了5年。我们还发现,司法系统行政机构报告中的数据对公共政策分析有重要贡献。面对持续的反监管力量和公共部门预算削减,记录执法活动与立法目标实现之间的关系至关重要。

相似文献

1
Using Enforcement and Adjudication Data to Assess the Impact of a Primary Safety Belt Law.利用执法与裁决数据评估主要安全带法的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(7):664-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.999857.
2
Traffic safety and the switch to a primary seat belt law: the California experience.交通安全与转向主要安全带法:加利福尼亚的经验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2002 Nov;34(6):743-51. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00074-4.
3
Cross-sectional study of road accidents and related law enforcement efficiency for 10 countries: A gap coherence analysis.10个国家道路交通事故及相关执法效率的横断面研究:差距一致性分析
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):686-91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1146823. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
4
Effectiveness of media and enforcement campaigns in increasing seat belt usage rates in a state with a secondary seat belt law.在一个实施二级安全带法的州,媒体宣传和执法行动对提高安全带使用率的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Aug;10(4):330-9. doi: 10.1080/15389580902995190.
5
Safety belt use and the switch to primary enforcement, 1991-2003.1991 - 2003年安全带使用情况及向主要执法方式的转变
Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1949-54. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.074385. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
6
Modeling the impact of rescinding Michigan's primary and secondary seat belt laws on death and injury from passenger vehicle crashes.模拟撤销密歇根州机动车事故中乘客死亡和受伤的主要和次要安全带法规的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(7):701-5. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.865167.
7
Do states upgrading to primary enforcement of safety belt laws experience increased daytime and nighttime belt use?升级到安全带法律主要执法的州,其白天和夜间的安全带使用率会提高吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Nov;39(6):1131-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
8
Seat belt use in States and territories with primary and secondary laws--United States, 2006.州和地区实施主次立法管理安全带使用情况——美国,2006 年。
J Safety Res. 2009;40(6):469-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
9
Underutilized strategies in traffic safety: Results of a nationally representative survey.交通安全中未充分利用的策略:一项全国代表性调查的结果。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S57-S62. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1654605. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
10
Primary Enforcement of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws and Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths.强制性安全带法律的主要执行与机动车碰撞死亡。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Aug;53(2):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce motor vehicle crashes and their injuries among the general and working populations.一项关于减少普通人群和工作人群机动车碰撞事故及其伤害的干预措施有效性的系统评价。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 May 4;42:e60. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.60. eCollection 2018.
3
Validation of the Korean criteria for trauma team activation.
韩国创伤团队启动标准的验证
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;5(4):256-263. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.265. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
Preventive Effects of Seat Belt on Clinical Outcomes for Road Traffic Injuries.安全带对道路交通伤害临床结局的预防作用
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Dec;30(12):1881-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1881. Epub 2015 Nov 30.