Miller Pamela J, Mesler Mark A, Eggman Susan T
Graduate School of Social Work, Portland State University, OR 97207, USA.
Soc Work Health Care. 2002;35(3):53-64. doi: 10.1300/J010v35n03_04.
This article presents a subset of data from a larger study that explored the impact of the legal choice of physician assisted suicide (PAS) on hospice providers. Eight social workers shared their personal and professional voices about a very controversial and difficult issue. Oregon is the only place in the country where PAS is legal and these social workers practice in an environment where the choice of PAS has been an option for two years. Three overarching themes emerged from the data: (1) the dilemmas that arise from the hospice philosophy; (2) the conflicts that emerge between the choice of PAS and social works' cardinal values and practice principles; and (3) the struggles with personal values and PAS.
本文呈现了一项更大规模研究中的部分数据,该研究探讨了医生协助自杀(PAS)的合法选择对临终关怀提供者的影响。八位社会工作者就这一极具争议性和挑战性的问题分享了他们的个人观点和专业见解。俄勒冈州是美国唯一允许PAS合法的地方,而这些社会工作者所处的环境中,PAS选项已存在两年。数据中出现了三个总体主题:(1)临终关怀理念引发的困境;(2)PAS选择与社会工作的核心价值观及实践原则之间出现的冲突;(3)个人价值观与PAS之间的挣扎。