Puig-Barberà J, Belenguer Varea A, Goterris Pinto M, Brines Benlliure M J
Grupo de Trabajo de Vacunas de la Sociedad Valenciana de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (SVMFYC). Promoción de Salud. Centro de Salud Pública de Castellón. Spain.
Aten Primaria. 2002 Sep 30;30(5):269-81; discussion 281-3. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79027-6.
Estimate pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness in preventing Streptococcus pneumoniae illness in the elderly.
Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE. MEDLINE, years 1964 to the 2000; EMBASE, from 1988 to the 2000; Cochrane Library, identified studies and previously published systematic reviews citations peruse, and contacts with field experts.
Clinical trials, cohort and case-control studies, published in Spanish, English or French, that estimated pneumococcal disease rates in vaccinated or not vaccinated elderly.
The studies were valued independently by four investigators with predefined criteria of validity, such as results comparing rates of disease caused by serotypes included in the vaccine, random allocation, double blind design, included subjects pertaining to the same study base, and losses of less than 10% in clinical trials and 20% in observational studies.
Eight clinical trials considered the relative risk (RR) of pneumococcal pneumonia, three did not make estimations on pneumonia originated by serotypes included in the vaccine and only one study fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. Vaccinated versus not vaccinated pneumococcal pneumonia RR was 0.86 (95%CI, 0.24 to 2.99). Vaccine effectiveness was 14% (95%CI, -199 to 76%). Ten studies performed estimations on the effectiveness of the vaccine on invasive disease by vaccine serotypes. Of these, two clinical trials and two observational studies fulfilled the required quality criteria. RR of invasive disease was of 0.68 (95%CI, 0.39-1.18); vaccine effectiveness was 32% (95%CI, 18-61%).
No evidence was found supporting pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness to reduce or avoid S. pneumoniae disease in the elderly.
评估肺炎球菌疫苗在预防老年人肺炎链球菌疾病方面的有效性。
系统评价和荟萃分析。数据来源:MEDLINE(1964年至2000年);EMBASE(1988年至2000年);Cochrane图书馆,检索已识别的研究和先前发表的系统评价引文,并与领域专家联系。
以西班牙语、英语或法语发表的临床试验、队列研究和病例对照研究,这些研究估计了接种或未接种疫苗的老年人的肺炎球菌疾病发生率。
由四名研究人员根据预先确定的有效性标准对研究进行独立评估,这些标准包括比较疫苗中所含血清型引起的疾病发生率的结果、随机分配、双盲设计、纳入属于同一研究基础的受试者,以及临床试验中损失率低于10%和观察性研究中损失率低于20%。
八项临床试验考虑了肺炎球菌肺炎的相对风险(RR),三项未对疫苗中所含血清型引起的肺炎进行估计,只有一项研究符合所有纳入标准。接种疫苗与未接种疫苗的肺炎球菌肺炎RR为0.86(95%CI,0.24至2.99)。疫苗有效性为14%(95%CI,-199至76%)。十项研究对疫苗对疫苗血清型侵袭性疾病的有效性进行了估计。其中,两项临床试验和两项观察性研究符合所需的质量标准。侵袭性疾病的RR为0.68(95%CI,0.39 - 1.18);疫苗有效性为32%(95%CI,18 - 61%)。
未发现证据支持肺炎球菌疫苗在降低或避免老年人肺炎链球菌疾病方面的有效性。