Viikari-Juntura E R
Department of Physiology, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Ergonomics. 1997 Oct;40(10):1097-117. doi: 10.1080/001401397187630.
Regulations concerning the work environment, tools, and the performance of work are at their best based on scientific evidence. Existing European directives, European and North American standards, and recent guidelines with the potential to prevent musculoskeletal disorders, are either qualitative or semiquantitative. The exception is the NIOSH lifting guide, which is highly quantitative. Of the European directives and standards, few have been developed with the primary goal of preventing musculoskeletal disorders, whereas one North American standard and another suggestion for a standard have this specific aim. In a review of epidemiological studies on low-back, neck, shoulder, and upper extremity disorders, several physical load factors were identified as risk factors for the disorders. Many of these factors have been repeatedly identified, and for different types of outcomes of an anatomical area (e.g. pain, disc herniation, disc degeneration of the low-back or neck). However, quantitative exposure-response relationships between physical load factors and disorders based on field studies are largely unknown. Experimental studies have provided a multitude of potentially useful data. It is concluded that both well-designed epidemiological studies with quantitative assessments of physical work load and valid measurements of musculoskeletal disorders, and experimental studies are needed for the future development of regulation. To determine the role of experimental studies in regulation, it should be known to what extent fatigue and other short-term responses are precursors of disorders. Regulation should be directed especially towards factors that are likely to be causative for musculoskeletal disorders. Examples of such factors are sudden overload in manual handling activities, heavy physical work involving manual handling tasks, and vibration from tools. Guidelines that are acceptable and feasible can and should be developed. The effects of such guidelines on the occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders should be investigated.
关于工作环境、工具和工作绩效的规定,最好以科学证据为依据。现有的欧洲指令、欧洲和北美的标准以及近期有可能预防肌肉骨骼疾病的指南,要么是定性的,要么是半定量的。唯一的例外是美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的提举指南,它具有高度的定量性。在欧洲的指令和标准中,很少有是以预防肌肉骨骼疾病为主要目标制定的,而一项北美标准和另一项标准建议则有这一特定目标。在对有关腰、颈、肩和上肢疾病的流行病学研究进行综述时,确定了几个身体负荷因素为这些疾病的危险因素。其中许多因素已被反复确认,并且涉及解剖区域的不同类型结果(例如疼痛、椎间盘突出、腰或颈的椎间盘退变)。然而,基于现场研究的身体负荷因素与疾病之间的定量暴露-反应关系在很大程度上尚不清楚。实验研究已经提供了大量潜在有用的数据。得出的结论是,未来法规的制定既需要精心设计的流行病学研究,对体力工作负荷进行定量评估并对肌肉骨骼疾病进行有效测量,也需要实验研究。为了确定实验研究在法规制定中的作用,应该了解疲劳和其他短期反应在多大程度上是疾病的先兆。法规应特别针对可能导致肌肉骨骼疾病的因素。此类因素的例子包括手工操作活动中的突然过载、涉及手工操作任务的繁重体力工作以及工具产生的振动。可以而且应该制定可接受且可行的指南。应该研究此类指南对肌肉骨骼疾病发生情况的影响。